Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804086›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Cortical Correlates of Attention to Auditory Features.

Emily J Allen, Philip C Burton, Juraj Mesik, Cheryl A Olman, Andrew J Oxenham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Infant Pitch and Timbre Discrimination in the Presence of Variation in the Other Dimension.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily J AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 prac0010@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8221-4875
Philip C BurtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.ORCID 0000-0001-5302-678X
Juraj MesikDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
Cheryl A OlmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
Andrew J OxenhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-1157
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Complex Pitch Perception in Complex EnvironmentsR01DC005216 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Andrew J. Oxenham · 2002 to 2026
$9.3M
High Performance Connectome Upgrade for Human 3T MR ScannerS10OD017974 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LIM, KELVIN O. · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005216NIH HHS S10 OD017974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitch and timbre are two primary features of auditory perception that are generally considered independent. However, an increase in pitch (produced by a change in fundamental frequency) can be confused with an increase in brightness (an attribute of timbre related to spectral centroid) and vice versa. Previous work indicates that pitch and timbre are processed in overlapping regions of the auditory cortex, but are separable to some extent via multivoxel pattern analysis. Here, we tested whether attention to one or other feature increases the spatial separation of their cortical representations and if attention can enhance the cortical representation of these features in the absence of any physical change in the stimulus. Ten human subjects (four female, six male) listened to pairs of tone triplets varying in pitch, timbre, or both and judged which tone triplet had the higher pitch or brighter timbre. Variations in each feature engaged common auditory regions with no clear distinctions at a univariate level. Attending to one did not improve the separability of the neural representations of pitch and timbre at the univariate level. At the multivariate level, the classifier performed above chance in distinguishing between conditions in which pitch or timbre was discriminated. The results confirm that the computations underlying pitch and timbre perception are subserved by strongly overlapping cortical regions, but reveal that attention to one or other feature leads to distinguishable activation patterns even in the absence of physical differences in the stimuli.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMusicPitch DiscriminationPitch PerceptionYoung Adultattentionauditory cortexfMRIpitchtimbre

Identifiers

PMID30804086
PMCPMC6788818
OpenAlexW2915991537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.