ArticleBMJ open2019
Qualitative, grounded theory exploration of patients' experience of early mobilisation, rehabilitation and recovery after critical illness.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Re-Engaging in Activities of Daily Living After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Humanizing and dehumanizing intensive care: Thematic synthesis (HumanIC).Journal of advanced nursing · 2023Pooled it
- Rehabilitation to enable recovery from COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.Physiotherapy · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of virtual reality assisted active limb movement exercises for patients in the respiratory intensive care unit: a randomized pilot study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Trial
- General practitioners' views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- The impact of early physical mobilisation for the management and prevention of intensive care unit delirium: A qualitative study exploring patients' perspectives.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Article
- Recovery After Critical Illness: A Meta-Ethnography of Patient, Family and Staff Perspectives.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Traumatic memories and nursing experiences of ICU discharged patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Study Protocol: Protocol of Intensive Care Unit Graded Mobilization (PG-Motion) Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A Mixed Methods Study of Inpatients' Experiences, Priorities, and Health-Related Quality of Life During High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2026Article
- Article
- Implementation of Early Mobilization in Post-CABG Patients: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Critical care beyond organ support: the importance of geriatric rehabilitation.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- The Experience of Physical Recovery and Physical Rehabilitation Following Hospital Discharge for Intensive Care Survivors-A Qualitative Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Revolutionary Role in Physical and Mental Rehabilitation: A Review of Recent Advancements.BioMed research international · 2024Review
- Article
- Mobilisation in the EveNing to prevent and TreAt deLirium (MENTAL): a mixed-methods, randomised controlled feasibility trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Patients' perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness: An interview study.Nursing in critical care · 2023Article
- Mobilisation in the EveNing to TreAt deLirium (MENTAL): protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationalePhysical rehabilitation (encompassing early mobilisation) of the critically ill patient is recognised best practice; however, further work is needed to explore the patients' experience of rehabilitation qualitatively; a better understanding may facilitate implementation of early rehabilitation and elucidate the journey of survivorship.
objectivesTo explore patient experience of physical rehabilitation from critical illness during and after a stay on intensive care unit (ICU).
designExploratory grounded theory study using semistructured interviews.
settingAdult medical/surgical ICU of a London teaching hospital.
participantsA purposive sample of ICU survivors with intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) and an ICU length of stay of >72 hours. ANALYSIS: Data analysis followed a four-stage constant comparison technique: open coding, axial coding, selective coding and model development, with the aim of reaching thematic saturation. Peer debriefing and triangulation through a patient support group were carried out to ensure credibility. MAIN
resultsFifteen people were interviewed (with four relatives in attendance). The early rehabilitation period was characterised by episodic memory loss, hallucinations, weakness and fatigue, making early rehabilitation arduous and difficult to recall. Participants craved a paternalised approach to care in the early days of ICU.The central idea that emerged from this study was recalibration of the self. This is driven by a lost sense of self, with loss of autonomy and competence; dehumanised elements of care may contribute to this. Participants described a fractured life narrative due to episodic memory loss, meaning that patients were shocked on awakening from sedation by the discrepancy between their physical form and cognitive representation of themselves.
conclusionsRecovery from ICUAW is a complex process that often begins with survivors exploring and adapting to a new body, followed by a period of recovering autonomy. Rehabilitation plays a key role in this recalibration period, helping survivors to reconstruct a desirable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.