Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803982›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.

Kate Sidaway-Lee, Denis Pereira Gray, Philip Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. GP continuity of care can be regained: lessons from Finland.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Development of a novel GP continuity measurement for practices without personal lists: a two-practice pilot of the modified SLICC.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Continuity of care measurement across health systems: UK and US insights for global primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multimorbidity and person-centred care in a socioeconomically deprived community: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. 'None of Them Know Me': A Qualitative Study of the Implications of Locum Doctor Working for Patient Experience.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. The decline in relationship continuity in England: can a European perspective help?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Realistic not romantic - real-world continuity in action.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  16. Which methods are most practicable for measuring continuity within general practices?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  17. Primary care contacts, continuity, identification of palliative care needs, and hospital use: a population-based cohort study in people dying with dementia.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  18. Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Beyond relational continuity.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate Sidaway-LeeSt Leonard's Research Practice and associate professor of general practice and primary care, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Denis Pereira GraySt Leonard's Research Practice and associate professor of general practice and primary care, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Philip EvansSt Leonard's Research Practice and associate professor of general practice and primary care, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite patient preference and many known benefits, continuity of care is in decline in general practice. The most common method of measuring continuity is the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index. This requires a number of appointments per patient and a relatively long timeframe for accuracy, reducing its applicability for day-to-day performance management.

aimTo describe the St Leonard's Index of Continuity of Care (SLICC) for measuring GP continuity regularly, and demonstrate how it has been used in service in general practice. DESIGN AND

settingAnalysis of appointment audit data from 2016-2017 in a general practice with 8823-9409 patients and seven part-time partners, in Exeter, UK.

methodThe percentage of face-to-face appointments for patients on each doctor's list, with the patient's personal doctor (the SLICC), was calculated monthly. The SLICC for different demographic groupings of patients (for example, sex and frequency of attendance) was compared. The UPC index over the 2 years was also calculated, allowing comparisons between indices.

resultsIn the 2-year study period, there were 35 622 GP face-to-face appointments; 1.96 per patient per year. Overall, 51.7% (95% confidence interval = 51.2 to 52.2) of GP appointments were with the patients' personal doctor. Patients aged ≥65 years had a higher level of continuity with 64.9% of appointments being with their personal doctor. The mean whole-practice UPC score was 0.61 (standard deviation 0.23), with 'usual provider' being the personal GP for 52.8% and a trainee or locum for 8.1% of patients.

conclusionThis method could provide working GPs with a simple way to track continuity of care and inform practice management and decision making.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesFamily PracticeGeneral PracticeAdultAgedContinuity of Patient CareDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsProcess Assessment, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareUnited Kingdomcontinuity of patient carefamily practicegeneral practicemeasurement

Identifiers

PMID30803982
PMCPMC6478463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.