Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803978›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

GPs' management of polypharmacy and therapeutic dilemma in patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional survey of GPs in France.

Hélène Carrier, Anna Zaytseva, Aurélie Bocquier, Patrick Villani, Hélène Verdoux, Martin Fortin, Pierre Verger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. GPs' mindlines on deprescribing antihypertensives in older patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in English general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hélène CarrierDepartment of General Practice, Aix-Marseille University, IRD (Research Institute for Development), AP-HM (Hospitals of Marseille), SSA (Army Health Services), VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, ORS Paca, Regional Health Observatory, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France.
Anna ZaytsevaAix-Marseille University, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, ORS Paca, Regional Health Observatory, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research), EHESS (School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences), Centrale Marseille, AMSE (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), Marseille, France.
Aurélie BocquierAix-Marseille University, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, ORS Paca, Regional Health Observatory, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France.
Patrick VillaniAix-Marseille University, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, ORS Paca, Regional Health Observatory, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, CHU Sainte Marguerite, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Marseille, France.
Hélène VerdouxUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, UMR 1219, Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Martin FortinDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Centre Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac St-Jean, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada.
Pierre VergerAix-Marseille University, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, ORS Paca, Regional Health Observatory, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France.
Méditerranée Infection Foundation · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRBordeaux Population Health · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGPs are confronted with therapeutic dilemmas in treating patients with multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy when unfavourable medication risk-benefit ratios (RBRs) conflict with patients' demands.

aimTo understand GPs' attitudes about prescribing and/or deprescribing medicines for patients with multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy, and factors associated with their decisions. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional survey in 2016 among a national panel of 1266 randomly selected GPs in private practice in France.

methodGPs' opinions and attitudes were explored using a standardised questionnaire including a case vignette about a female treated for multiple somatic diseases, sleeping disorders, and chronic pain. Participants were randomly assigned one of eight versions of this case vignette, varying by patient age, socioprofessional status, and stroke history. Backward selection was used to identify factors associated with GPs' decisions about drugs they considered inappropriate.

resultsNearly all (91.4%) responders felt comfortable or fairly comfortable deprescribing inappropriate medications, but only 34.7% decided to do so often or very often. In the clinical vignette, most GPs chose to discontinue symptomatic medications (for example, benzodiazepine, paracetamol/tramadol) because of unfavourable RBRs. When patients asked for ketoprofen for persistent sciatica, 94.1% considered this prescription risky, but 25.6% would prescribe it. They were less likely to prescribe it to older patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36 to 0.63), or those with a stroke history (AOR 0.55, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.72).

conclusionIn therapeutic dilemmas, some GPs choose to prioritise patients' requests over iatrogenic risks. GPs need pragmatic implementation tools for handling therapeutic dilemmas, and to improve their skills in medication management and patient engagement in such situations.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsGeneral PractitionersPolypharmacyAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelChronic PainClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHealth Care SurveysHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Chronic Conditionscross-sectional surveygeneral practicemultimorbiditypolypharmacyrisk–benefit ratio

Identifiers

PMID30803978
PMCPMC6428490
OpenAlexW2916977055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.