ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2019
Prenatal care among mothers involved with child protection services in Manitoba: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal characteristics and factors contributing to congenital syphilis: A descriptive analysis of cases reported to the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program June 2021 through May 2023.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Access to and engagement with healthcare services among women with Children's Social Care involvement during the perinatal period who subsequently died: a confidential enquiry.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Separation at birth due to safeguarding concerns: Using reproductive justice theory to re-think the role of midwives.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- The rise of congenital syphilis in Canada: threats and opportunities.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Prescribed and Penalized: The Detrimental Impact of Mandated Reporting for Prenatal Utilization of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Article
- Heart work: Indigenous doulas responding to challenges of western systems and revitalizing Indigenous birthing care in Canada.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Child Maltreatment and Public Health: Do Gaps in Response during the COVID-19 Pandemic Highlight Jurisdictional Complexities?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Maternal health, pregnancy and birth outcomes for women involved in care proceedings in Wales: a linked data study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Indigenous representation and engagement in research using routinely collected data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Ensuring Indigenous participation in research on the health and well-being of Indigenous Peoples.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Truth, respect and recognition: addressing barriers to Indigenous maternity care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrenatal care is one of the most widely used preventive health services; however, use varies substantially. Our objective was to examine prenatal care among women with a history of having a child placed in out-of-home care, and whether their care differed from care among women who did not.
methodsWe used linkable administrative data to create a population-based cohort of women whose first 2 children were born in Manitoba, Canada, between Apr. 1, 1998, and Mar. 1, 2015. We measured the level of prenatal care using the Revised Graduated Prenatal Care Utilization Index, which categorizes care into 5 groups: intensive, adequate, intermediate, inadequate and no care. We compared level of prenatal care for women whose first child was placed in care with level of prenatal care for women who had no contact with care services, using 2 multinomial logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (ORs).
resultsIn a cohort of 52 438 mothers, 1284 (2.4%) had their first child placed in out-of-home care before conception of their second child. Mothers whose first child was placed in care had much higher rates of inadequate prenatal care during the pregnancy with their second child than mothers whose first child was not placed in care (33.0% v. 13.4%). The odds of having inadequate rather than adequate prenatal care were more than 4 times higher (OR 4.29, 95% CI 3.68 to 5.01) for women who had their first child placed in care than for women who did not have their first child placed in care.
interpretationMothers with a history of having a child taken into care by the child protection services system are at higher risk of having inadequate or no prenatal care in a subsequent pregnancy compared with mothers with no history of involvement with child protection services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.