Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803814›Full record

Trial reportClinical radiology2019

Breast arterial calcification on mammography and risk of coronary artery disease: a SCOT-HEART sub-study.

S McLenachan, F Camilleri, M Smith, D E Newby, M C Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S McLenachanDepartment of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
F CamilleriDepartment of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
M SmithEdinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
D E NewbyUniversity of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
M C WilliamsUniversity of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: michelle.williams@ed.ac.uk.
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/588Chief Scientist Office PCL/17/04Medical Research Council G0701127Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the prevalence of breast arterial calcification (BAC) in patients who also underwent routine surveillance mammography, and to determine the association with cardiovascular risk factors, coronary artery calcification, and coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). MATERIALS AND

methodsFour hundred and five female participants were identified who had undergone CCTA and subsequent mammography in the SCOT-HEART randomised controlled trial of CCTA in patients with suspected stable angina. Mammograms were assessed visually for the presence and severity of BAC.

resultsBAC was identified in 93 (23%) patients. Patients with BAC were slightly older (63±7 versus 59±8 years, p<0.001), with a higher cardiovascular risk score (19±11 versus 16±10, p=0.022) and were more likely to be non-smokers (73% versus 49%, p<0.001). In patients with BAC, coronary artery calcification was present in 58 patients (62%; relative risk [RR] 1.26, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.04, 1.53; p=0.02), non-obstructive coronary artery disease in 58 (62%; RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.54, p=0.02), and obstructive coronary artery disease in 19 (20%; RR 1.62, 95% CI: 0.98, 2.66; p=0.058). Patients without BAC were very unlikely to have severe coronary artery calcification (negative predictive value 95%) but the diagnostic accuracy of BAC to identify coronary artery disease was poor (AUC 0.547).

conclusionAlthough BAC is associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcification, the diagnostic accuracy to identify patients with coronary artery disease or obstructive coronary artery disease is poor.

Indexed as

BreastBreast DiseasesComorbidityCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedRisk FactorsScotlandTomography, X-Ray ComputedVascular Calcification

Identifiers

PMID30803814
PMCPMC6512949
OpenAlexW2917271457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.