Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803484›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Bumblebee visual allometry results in locally improved resolution and globally improved sensitivity.

Gavin J Taylor, Pierre Tichit, Marie D Schmidt, Andrew J Bodey, Christoph Rau, Emily Baird

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Photoreceptor recordings reveal remarkable acuity in small solitary bees compared with larger species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The potential underlying mechanisms during learning flights.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Visual acuity ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gavin J TaylorDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4787-9844
Pierre TichitDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-6073
Marie D SchmidtDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Andrew J BodeyDiamond Light Source, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Christoph RauDiamond Light Source, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Emily BairdDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3625-3897
Lund University · SEDiamond Light Source · GBStockholm University · SE

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA8655-12-1-2136Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning CTS15:38Interreg Europe LU-011Vetenskapsrådet 2014-4762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of visual information that is available to an animal is limited by the size of its eyes. Differences in eye size can be observed even between closely related individuals, yet we understand little about how this affects vision. Insects are good models for exploring the effects of size on visual systems because many insect species exhibit size polymorphism. Previous work has been limited by difficulties in determining the 3D structure of eyes. We have developed a novel method based on x-ray microtomography to measure the 3D structure of insect eyes and to calculate predictions of their visual capabilities. We used our method to investigate visual allometry in the bumblebee

Indexed as

Vision, OcularAnimalsBeesBiometryEntomologyEyeX-Ray Microtomographyallometrycomputational biologycomputational geometryeyesMicroCTneuroscienceoptical modelsystems biologyvision

Identifiers

PMID30803484
PMCPMC6391067
OpenAlexW2950403245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.