Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803437›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2019

How to eliminate taeniasis/cysticercosis: porcine vaccination and human chemotherapy (Part 2).

Norma Y Sánchez-Torres, Juan R Bobadilla, Juan P Laclette, Marco V José

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CystiHuman: A model of human neurocysticercosis.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Optimal control analysis ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effect of oxfendazole to controlJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Modelling forBulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Norma Y Sánchez-TorresTheoretical Biology Group, Biomedical Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, CDMX, Mexico.
Juan R BobadillaTheoretical Biology Group, Biomedical Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, CDMX, Mexico.
Juan P LacletteDepartment of Immunology, Biomedical Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, CDMX, Mexico.
Marco V JoséTheoretical Biology Group, Biomedical Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, CDMX, Mexico. marcojose@biomedicas.unam.mx.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of effective vaccines against pig cysticercosis and mass chemotherapy against pig cysticercosis and human taeniasis have shown the feasibility of interrupting the parasite's life cycle in endemic areas.

methodsA mathematical model that divides the population into susceptible, infected, and vaccinated individuals is formulated. The model is based upon the life cycle of the parasite. Computer numerical simulation experiments to evaluate the impact of pig vaccination under different vaccination schedules, and combined intervention strategies including pig vaccination and anthelmintic treatment against human taeniasis are carried out.

resultsVaccination against either pig cysticercosis or against human taeniasis will influence the transmission dynamics not only among vaccinees but also the dynamics of the other hosts as well. When the protective efficacy and/or the coverage rate is less than 100%, different mass interventions like vaccinating the pig population twice in combination with chemotherapeutic treatment against human taeniasis, the elimination of the infection in both pigs and humans can also be achieved.

conclusionsOur mathematical model has the potential for planning, and designing effective intervention strategies including both mass vaccination and/or chemotherapeutic treatment to eliminate pig cysticercosis, human taeniasis and human neurocysticercosis. The model can be adapted to any given community with mild, moderate endemicity, or even in hyperendemic regions.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsCysticercosisDrug TherapyHumansSwineTaeniasisVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesChemotherapeutic interventionsComputer simulation experimentsEliminationEradicationPublic healthSusceptible-infected mathematical modelTaenia-cysticercosisVaccination strategies

Identifiers

PMID30803437
PMCPMC6390339
OpenAlexW2924813709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.