Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803433›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Well informed physician-patient communication in consultations on back pain - study protocol of the cluster randomized GAP trial.

Sebastian Voigt-Radloff, Andrea C Schöpf, Martin Boeker, Luca Frank, Erik Farin, Klaus Kaier, Mirjam Körner, Katharina Wollmann, Britta Lang, Joerg J Meerpohl and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian Voigt-RadloffInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Andrea C SchöpfSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin BoekerMedical Data Science, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Luca FrankFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of General Practice, Erlangen, Germany.
Erik FarinSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus KaierDivision Methods in Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Mirjam KörnerMedical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Katharina WollmannInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany. wollmann@ifem.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7853-4967
Britta LangClinical Trials Unit of the Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Ralph MöhlerSchool of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Wilhelm NieblingDivision of General Practice, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Julia SerongInstitute for Journalism, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Renate LangeBavarian State Association of Company Health Insurance Funds, Bavarian, Germany.
Piet van der KeylenFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of General Practice, Erlangen, Germany.
Andy MaunSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEBielefeld University · DENational Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians · DETU Dortmund University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBack pain is one of the most frequent causes of health-related work absence. In Germany, more than 70% of adults suffer from at least one back pain episode per annum. It has strong impact on health care costs and patients' quality of life. Patients increasingly seek health information on the internet. However, judging its trustworthiness is difficult. In addition, physicians who are being confronted with this type of information often experience it to complicate the physician-patient interaction. The GAP trial aims to develop, implement and evaluate an evidence-based, easy-to-understand and trustworthy internet information portal on lower back pain to be used by general practitioners and patients during and after the consultation. Effectiveness of GAP portal use compared to routine consultation on improving communication and informedness of both physicians and patients will be assessed. In addition, effects on health care costs and patients' days of sick leave will be evaluated.

methodsWe will conduct a prospective multi-centre, cluster-randomized parallel group trial including 1500 patients and 150 recruiting general practitioners. The intervention group will have access to the GAP portal. The portal will contain brief guides for patients and physicians on how to improve the consultation as well as information on epidemiology, aetiology, symptoms, benefits and harms of treatment options for acute, sub-acute and chronic lower back pain. The GAP portal will be designed to be user-friendly and present information on back pain tailored for either patients or physicians in form of brief fact sheets, educative videos, info-graphics, animations and glossaries. Physicians and patients will assess their informedness and the physician-patient communication in consultations at baseline and at two time points after the consultations under investigation. Days of sick leave and health care costs related to back pain will be compared between control and intervention group using routine data of company health insurance funds. DISCUSSION: The GAP-trial intends to improve the communication between physicians and their patients and the informedness of both groups. If proven beneficial, the evidence-based and user-friendly portal will be made accessible for all patients and health professionals in back pain care. Inclusion of further indications might be implemented and evaluated in the long term.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00014279 (registered 27th of April 2018).

Indexed as

CommunicationGeneral PractitionersInternetLow Back PainPhysician-Patient RelationsConsumer Health InformationDisease ManagementHealth Care CostsHumansPatient PortalsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSick LeaveEvidence-based medicineHealth communicationInternet portalLower back painPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID30803433
PMCPMC6388488
OpenAlexW2925265648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.