Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803400›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises.

Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter, William M Whitmer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05828017 (Investigating Hearing Aid Frequency Response Curves 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05828017 nacompletednot on this map

Investigating Hearing Aid Frequency Response Curves 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorSonova AGRan2023 to 2023Enrolled25ConditionsHearing Loss, Sensorineural, Hearing Loss, BilateralArmsHearing Aid - Standard Curve under Program 1, Hearing Aid - Variation #1 under Program 1, Hearing Aid - Variation #2 under Program 5 - Streaming Only, Hearing Aid - Variation #3 under Program 5 - Streaming Only, Hearing Aid - Variation #4under Program 5 - Streaming Only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter1 Hearing Sciences-Scottish Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3386-3860
William M Whitmer1 Hearing Sciences-Scottish Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-6851
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist OfficeMedical Research Council 1601056Medical Research Council MC_U135097131Medical Research Council MR/S003576/1Medical Research Council U135097131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequency-dependent gain adjustments are routine in hearing-aid fittings, whether in matching to real-ear targets or fine-tuning to patient feedback. Patient feedback may be unreliable and fittings inefficient if adjustments are not discriminable. To examine what gain adjustments are discriminable, we measured the just-noticeable differences (JNDs) for level increments in speech-shaped noises processed with prescription gains. JNDs were measured in the better ears of 38 participants with hearing impairment using a fixed-level, same-different task. JNDs were measured for increments at six individual frequency-bands: a 0.25-kHz low-pass band; octave-wide bands at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz; and a 6-kHz high-pass band. JNDs for broadband increments were also measured. JNDs were estimated at d' of 1 for a minimally discriminable increment in optimal laboratory conditions. The JND for frequency-band increments was 2.8 dB excluding the 0.25-kHz low-pass band, for which the JND was 4.5 dB. The JND for broadband increments was 1.5 dB. Participants' median frequency-band and broadband JNDs were positively correlated. JNDs were mostly independent of age, pure-tone thresholds, and cognitive score. In consideration of self-fitting adjustments in noisier conditions, JNDs were additionally estimated at a more sensitive d' of 2. These JNDs were 6 dB for bands below 1 kHz, and 5 dB for bands at and above 1 kHz. Overall, the results suggest noticeable fine-tuning adjustments of 3 dB and self-fitting adjustments of 5 dB.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAdultAgedFemaleHearing AidsHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseSpeechhearing-aid fittinghearing-aid gainhearing aidsjust-noticeable differences

Identifiers

PMID30803400
PMCPMC6351966
OpenAlexW2909827666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.