Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803394›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2019

Intraoperative Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Willard Wong, Illana Rubenchik, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Elzbieta Slodkowska, Carlos Parra-Herran, Wedad M Hanna, Fang-I Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Willard Wong1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0294-5801
Illana Rubenchik1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon Nofech-Mozes1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elzbieta Slodkowska1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carlos Parra-Herran1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wedad M Hanna1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fang-I Lu1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-7613
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShift toward minimizing axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer post neoadjuvant therapy has led to the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes by frozen section intraoperatively to determine the need for axillary lymph node dissection. However, few studies have examined the accuracy of sentinel lymph node frozen section after neoadjuvant therapy. Our objective is to compare the accuracy of sentinel lymph node frozen section in patients with breast cancer with and without neoadjuvant therapy and to identify features that may influence accuracy.

designWe identified 161 sentinel lymph node frozen section from 77 neoadjuvant therapy patients and 255 sentinel lymph node frozen section from 88 non-neoadjuvant therapy patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 in 2 institutions. The frozen section diagnoses were compared to the final diagnoses, and clinicopathologic data were analyzed.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of frozen section analysis were comparable between neoadjuvant therapy patients and non-neoadjuvant therapy patients (71.9% vs 50%, 100% vs 100%, and 88.3% vs 81.8%). Nine (11.7%) of 77 neoadjuvant therapy patients had discordant results, most often due to undersampling (tumor absent on frozen section slide). Four of these patients subsequently underwent axillary lymph node dissection. Discordant results (all false negatives) were significantly more likely in neoadjuvant therapy patients with Estrogen Receptor-positive/HER2-negative status, and in sentinel lymph node with pN1mic and pN0i+ deposits; age, preneoadjuvant therapy lymph node status, histotype, nuclear grade, tumor size, and response to neoadjuvant therapy showed no significant differences. For non-neoadjuvant therapy cases, large tumor size, lobular histotype, and sentinel lymph node with pN1mic and pN0i+ were associated with false-negative frozen section assessment.

conclusionSentinel lymph node frozen section diagnosis post-neoadjuvant therapy has comparable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to the sentinel lymph node frozen section diagnosis in the non-neoadjuvant therapy setting.

Indexed as

Intraoperative CareNeoadjuvant TherapyBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node Biopsybreast carcinomaintraoperative assessmentneoadjuvant therapysentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30803394
PMCPMC6373999
OpenAlexW2909180257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.