Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803273›Full record

ArticleBrain connectivity2019

Using Low-Frequency Oscillations to Detect Temporal Lobe Epilepsy with Machine Learning.

Gyujoon Hwang, Veena A Nair, Jed Mathis, Cole J Cook, Rosaleena Mohanty, Gengyan Zhao, Neelima Tellapragada, Candida Ustine, Onyekachi O Nwoke, Charlene Rivera-Bonet and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain connectivity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning techniques based onFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gyujoon Hwang1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Veena A Nair2 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jed Mathis3 Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Cole J Cook1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Rosaleena Mohanty4 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gengyan Zhao1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Neelima Tellapragada2 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Candida Ustine5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Onyekachi O Nwoke6 School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Charlene Rivera-Bonet7 Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Megan Rozman5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Linda Allen5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Courtney Forseth8 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Dace N Almane8 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Peter Kraegel5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Andrew Nencka3 Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Elizabeth Felton8 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Aaron F Struck8 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Rasmus Birn1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Rama Maganti8 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Lisa L Conant5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Colin J Humphries5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Bruce Hermann8 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Manoj Raghavan5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Edgar A DeYoe3 Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jeffrey R Binder5 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Elizabeth Meyerand1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Vivek Prabhakaran1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Alzheimer's Disease Connectome ProjectUF1AG051216 · NIA · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BENDLIN, BARBARA BRIGITTA, LI, SHI-JIANG · 2016 to 2019
$5.8M
The Epilepsy Connectome ProjectU01NS093650 · NINDS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BINDER, JEFFREY R, MEYERAND, MARY E. · 2015 to 2018
$5.1M
The Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Connectome ProjectR01NS111022 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI STRUCK, AARON F · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206NIA NIH HHS UF1 AG051216NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111022NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS093650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health-sponsored Epilepsy Connectome Project aims to characterize connectivity changes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients. The magnetic resonance imaging protocol follows that used in the Human Connectome Project, and includes 20 min of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging acquired at 3T using 8-band multiband imaging. Glasser parcellation atlas was combined with the FreeSurfer subcortical regions to generate resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC), amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFFs), and fractional ALFF measures. Seven different frequency ranges such as Slow-5 (0.01-0.027 Hz) and Slow-4 (0.027-0.073 Hz) were selected to compute these measures. The goal was to train machine learning classification models to discriminate TLE patients from healthy controls, and to determine which combination of the resting state measure and frequency range produced the best classification model. The samples included age- and gender-matched groups of 60 TLE patients and 59 healthy controls. Three traditional machine learning models were trained: support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, and naive Bayes classifier. The highest classification accuracy was obtained using RSFC measures in the Slow-4 + 5 band (0.01-0.073 Hz) as features. Leave-one-out cross-validation accuracies were ∼83%, with receiver operating characteristic area-under-the-curve reaching close to 90%. Increased connectivity from right area posterior 9-46v in TLE patients contributed to the high accuracies. With increased sample sizes in the near future, better machine learning models will be trained not only to aid the diagnosis of TLE, but also as a tool to understand this brain disorder.

Indexed as

AdultBayes TheoremBrainConnectomeEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleFunctional LateralityHippocampusHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector MachineTemporal LobeALFFconnectomefunctional connectivitymachine learningresting-state fMRItemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID30803273
PMCPMC6484357
OpenAlexW2916415046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.