ArticleBrain connectivity2019
Using Low-Frequency Oscillations to Detect Temporal Lobe Epilepsy with Machine Learning.
Article in Brain connectivity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in epilepsy - applications and pathways to the clinic.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Adding the third dimension: 3D convolutional neural network diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Machine learning techniques based onFrontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm to Determine Lateralization of Seizure Onset in Patients With Epilepsy: A Proof-of-Principle Study.Neurology · 2023Article
- Resting-State Functional MRI/PET Profile as a Potential Alternative to Tri-Modality EEG-MR/PET Imaging: An Exploratory Study in Drug-Refractory Epilepsy.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2023Article
- DeepEZ: A Graph Convolutional Network for Automated Epileptogenic Zone Localization From Resting-State fMRI Connectivity.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- Common functional connectivity alterations in focal epilepsies identified by machine learning.Epilepsia · 2022Article
- Clinical Application of Machine Learning Models for Brain Imaging in Epilepsy: A Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Neuroticism in temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with altered limbic-frontal lobe resting-state functional connectivity.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2020Article
- Identification of Subclinical Language Deficit Using Machine Learning Classification Based on Poststroke Functional Connectivity Derived from Low Frequency Oscillations.Brain connectivity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health-sponsored Epilepsy Connectome Project aims to characterize connectivity changes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients. The magnetic resonance imaging protocol follows that used in the Human Connectome Project, and includes 20 min of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging acquired at 3T using 8-band multiband imaging. Glasser parcellation atlas was combined with the FreeSurfer subcortical regions to generate resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC), amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFFs), and fractional ALFF measures. Seven different frequency ranges such as Slow-5 (0.01-0.027 Hz) and Slow-4 (0.027-0.073 Hz) were selected to compute these measures. The goal was to train machine learning classification models to discriminate TLE patients from healthy controls, and to determine which combination of the resting state measure and frequency range produced the best classification model. The samples included age- and gender-matched groups of 60 TLE patients and 59 healthy controls. Three traditional machine learning models were trained: support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, and naive Bayes classifier. The highest classification accuracy was obtained using RSFC measures in the Slow-4 + 5 band (0.01-0.073 Hz) as features. Leave-one-out cross-validation accuracies were ∼83%, with receiver operating characteristic area-under-the-curve reaching close to 90%. Increased connectivity from right area posterior 9-46v in TLE patients contributed to the high accuracies. With increased sample sizes in the near future, better machine learning models will be trained not only to aid the diagnosis of TLE, but also as a tool to understand this brain disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.