ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019
Comparison of Colposcopic Biopsy Results of Patients Who have Cytomorphological Normal but HPV 16-18 or Other High-Risk HPV Subtypes Positive
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- HPV persistence and CIN2 + Detection in women with normal cytology and Non-16/18 High-Risk HPV positivity.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Metagenomic insight into the vaginal microbiome in women infected with HPV 16 and 18.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in Patients with Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Women Infected with Multiple High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses.Iranian journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Colposcopy Value in Young Child-bearing Women: Is New Recommendations Necessary?Advanced biomedical research · 2024Article
- Could HPV Type 33 Be More Risky Than We Thought?International journal of surgical pathology · 2023Article
- Associations of human papillomavirus genotypes and cervical vascular abnormality in a cohort of women underwent colposcopy, a retrospective study of 6716 patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current guidelines suggest annual co-test follow-up in non-16/18 high-risk HPV positive patients without abnormal cytologic findings. Considering the relatively high false-negative rates of cervical cytology, a follow-up period of one year might constitute an additional risk for development of cervical malignancies in these patients. The current study aims to evaluate colposcopic biopsy results of cytologically normal patients detected to carry high risk HPV by screening tests. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 patients with normal cervical cytology and high-risk HPV subtypes who underwent colposcopic examination were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their HPV results: HPV 16-18 and other types (non-16/18 high-risk subtypes). ECC, cervical biopsy, LEEP/ conization results were analyzed for both groups. Histopathological results of the groups were compared in terms of ≤LSIL, HSIL and cervical cancer rates. Results: Cervical biopsy results in the “16-18” group were assessed as HSIL in 40 (48.2%) patients, LSIL in 6 patients (7.2%) and normal in 37 (44.6%) patients. ECC results revealed HSIL in 9 (10.8%) patients and LSIL in 1 (1.2%) patient. Nineteen out of 42 patients who underwent LEEP/conization had HSIL (surgical margin positivity was reported in 4 cases), while 3 patients had LSIL. None of the cases had cervical carcinoma. Conclusion: The present study detected that 15.6% of women infected with non-16/18 high-risk HPV subgroups developed ≥HSIL lesions. Although this rate seems lower than HPV 16-18 group, it is still too high to be overlooked. In conclusion, we suggest further clinical trials with larger number of patients to be conducted on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.