Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30803191›Full record

ReviewAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

A Critical Review of Instruments Measuring the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Iranian Studies and Their Psychometrics Properties

Shirin Hasanvand, Maryam Rassouli, Zahra Mandegari, Naiire Salmani, Farzaneh Moghimkhan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04521257 (Development of Urdu Version of Short Form 36 Health Questionnaire; Validation and Reliability Analysis in Healthy Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04521257 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Development of Urdu Version of Short Form 36 Health Questionnaire; Validation and Reliability Analysis in Healthy Population

TypeobservationalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsQuality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Progress in the study of quality of life related scales for chronic otitis media].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shirin HasanvandSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Maryam RassouliCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra MandegariMeybod Nursing School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.Email: n.salmani@ssu.ac.ir
Naiire SalmaniMeybod Nursing School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.Email: n.salmani@ssu.ac.ir
Farzaneh MoghimkhanMedical Library and Information Sciences, Mofid Children Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Over the past three decades, more than 100 instruments have been developed that measure the quality of life. In order to ensure accuracy and authenticity of the measurements, it is essential to utilize the instruments that have proper psychometric properties. Therefore, this critical review study aimed at comparing the instruments that measured the life quality of cancer patients in Iranian studies. Methods: In this study, Persian articles published in Iranian databases (IranMedex, Irandoc Magiran, SID) from 2006 to 2016 were searched, using the following keywords: nursing, cancer, tools, scale, and quality of life. A total number of 159 articles were obtained, of which 33 articles complied with the inclusion criteria of this study and thereby were reviewed. Results: Sixty nine percent of the articles explored the life quality of adult females with breast cancer, and the most-commonly used instrument was a quality-of-Life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology belonging to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. More than half of the studies referred solely to Iranian studies to address psychometric properties. Though, no method was introduced in order to address the validity and reliability of instruments in the articles under consideration. Conclusion: According to the findings, the studies which explored the validity and reliability of instruments concerning the life quality of cancer patients were scarce. Therefore, the researchers should pay further attention to the validity and reliability of instruments for selection of an appropriate instrument in this area of research. Also, the researchers are encouraged to further study the psychometric properties of relevant instruments so that optimal generalizability and authenticity of their findings can be attained.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeHumansIranNeoplasmsPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnairescancerpsychometric evaluationQuality of lifereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID30803191
PMCPMC6897017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.