SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Iodine supplementation for the prevention of mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of oral iodine supplementation in very low birth weight preterm infants for the prevention of thyroid function alterations during the neonatal period: results of a randomised assessor-blinded pilot trial and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Trial
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023Article
- Iodine: a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.Food & nutrition research · 2023Article
- Assessment of Iodine Concentration in Human Milk from Donors: Implications for Preterm Infants.Nutrients · 2022Article
- The Role of Iodine for Thyroid Function in Lactating Women and Infants.Endocrine reviews · 2022Review
- Effectiveness of feeding supplementation in preterm infants: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC pediatrics · 2022Review
- Congenital Hypothyroidism in Preterm Newborns - The Challenges of Diagnostics and Treatment: A Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Iodine: Its Role in Thyroid Hormone Biosynthesis and Beyond.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Preterm nutrition and neurodevelopmental outcomes.World journal of methodology · 2021Review
- Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Thyroid Function in Preterm/Low Birth Weight Infants: Impact on Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Dysfunction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes and determinants of iodine deficiency in third trimester of pregnancy in an iodine sufficient area.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Iodine Status in Schoolchildren and Pregnant Women of Lazio, a Central Region of Italy.Nutrients · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParenteral nutrition solutions, artificial formulas, and human breast milk contain insufficient iodine to meet recommended intakes for preterm infants. Iodine deficiency may exacerbate transient hypothyroxinaemia in preterm infants and this may be associated with adverse neonatal and longer-term outcomes.
objectivesTo assess the evidence from randomised controlled trials that dietary supplementation with iodine reduces mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. SEARCH
methodsWe used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2018, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Maternity & Infant Care Database, and CINAHL to February 2018. We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared supplementing enteral or parenteral feeds with iodine (as iodide salt) versus placebo or no supplementation in preterm infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We analysed treatment effects as described in the individual trials and reported risk ratios (RR) and risk differences for dichotomous data, and mean differences (MD) for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used a fixed-effect model in meta-analyses and planned to explore potential causes of heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence. MAIN
resultsTwo randomised controlled trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Both trials used methods to limit bias including allocation concealment and blinding of clinicians and investigators to the allocated intervention. The trials enrolled 1394 infants. One trial recruited 1273 participants. Most participants were born very preterm (less than 32 weeks' gestation) and about one-third were extremely preterm (less than 28 weeks' gestation). Analyses found no effect of iodine supplementation on mortality before hospital discharge (typical RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 2 studies, 1380 infants) or on neurodevelopmental assessments at two years post-term (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition main domain composite scores: cognitive: MD -0.30, 95% CI -2.44 to 1.84; motor: MD 0.20, 95% CI -2.15 to 2.55; language: MD -0.10, 95% CI -2.50 to 2.30; 1 study, 1259 infants). There were no differences in the proportion of infants who died or had a composite score less than 85 in any main Bayley domain (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.17; 1 study, 1259 infants), or had visual impairment (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.45; 1 study, 1092 infants) or auditory impairment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.16; 1 study, 1093 infants). Using GRADE methods, we assessed the evidence for the effects on mortality and neurodevelopment outcomes as high-certainty. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe available trial data, predominantly from one large, high-quality multicentre study published in 2017, do not show any evidence of beneficial effects of iodine supplementation for preterm infants. Given the high certainty of these estimates of effect, further trials of this intervention in this population are unlikely to be considered research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.