Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802855›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019

A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying Ischemic Stroke Onset Time From Imaging.

King Chung Ho, William Speier, Haoyue Zhang, Fabien Scalzo, Suzie El-Saden, Corey W Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

King Chung Ho
William Speier
Haoyue Zhang
Fabien Scalzo
Suzie El-Saden
Corey W Arnold

Funding

UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM008042 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AJIJOLA, OLUJIMI A, DAWSON, DAVID WAYNE · 1985 to 2023
$29.9M
Medical Imaging Informatics Training GrantT32EB016640 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, William Hsu · 2013 to 2026
$2.3M
A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying Time Since Stroke using Medical ImagingR01NS100806 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, COREY WELLS · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Development of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model for the Generation of Cancer Probability Maps and Imaging Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer using Multiparametric MRIF30CA210329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SARMA, KARTHIK VENKATARAMAN · 2016 to 2022
$173k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA210329NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB016640NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008042NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current clinical practice relies on clinical history to determine the time since stroke (TSS) onset. Imaging-based determination of acute stroke onset time could provide critical information to clinicians in deciding stroke treatment options, such as thrombolysis. The patients with unknown or unwitnessed TSS are usually excluded from thrombolysis, even if their symptoms began within the therapeutic window. In this paper, we demonstrate a machine learning approach for TSS classification using routinely acquired imaging sequences. We develop imaging features from the magnetic resonance (MR) images and train machine learning models to classify the TSS. We also propose a deep-learning model to extract hidden representations for the MR perfusion-weighted images and demonstrate classification improvement by incorporating these additional deep features. The cross-validation results show that our best classifier achieved an area under the curve of 0.765, with a sensitivity of 0.788 and a negative predictive value of 0.609, outperforming existing methods. We show that the features generated by our deep-learning algorithm correlate with the MR imaging features, and validate the robustness of the model on imaging parameter variations (e.g., year of imaging). This paper advances magnetic resonance imaging analysis one-step-closer to an operational decision support tool for stroke treatment guidance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsBrainBrain IschemiaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingStroke

Identifiers

PMID30802855
PMCPMC6661120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.