Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802638›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2019

Environmental impacts of dietary shifts in India: A modelling study using nationally-representative data.

L Aleksandrowicz, R Green, E J M Joy, F Harris, J Hillier, S H Vetter, P Smith, B Kulkarni, A D Dangour, A Haines

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Carbon dioxide (COEnvironmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing the sustainability of post-Green Revolution cereals in India.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

L AleksandrowiczDept. of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture & Health, UK. Electronic address: Lukasz.aleksandrowicz@lshtm.ac.uk.
R GreenDept. of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture & Health, UK.
E J M JoyDept. of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture & Health, UK.
F HarrisDept. of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
J HillierRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, UK.
S H VetterInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK.
P SmithInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK.
B KulkarniClinical Division, National Institute of Nutrition, India.
A D DangourDept. of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture & Health, UK.
A HainesDept. of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK; Dept. of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLeverhulme Trust · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBNational Institute of Nutrition · INRoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food production is a major driver of environmental change, and unhealthy diets are the leading cause of global disease burden. In high-income countries (HICs), modelling studies suggest that adoption of healthy diets could improve population health and reduce environmental footprints associated with food production. We assessed whether such benefits from dietary change could occur in India, where under-nutrition and overweight and obesity are simultaneously prevalent. We calculated the potential changes in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, blue and green water footprints (WFs), and land use (LU), that would result from shifting current national food consumption patterns in India to healthy diets (meeting dietary guidelines) and to "affluent diets" (those consumed by the wealthiest quartile of households, which may represent future purchasing power and nutritional trajectories). Dietary data were derived from the 2011-12 nationally-representative household expenditure survey, and we assessed dietary scenarios nationally and across six Indian sub-regions, by rural or urban location, and for those consuming above or below recommended dietary energy intakes. We modelled the changes in consumption of 34 food groups necessary to meet Indian dietary guidelines, as well as an affluent diet representative of those in the highest wealth quartile. These changes were combined with food-specific data on GHG emissions, calculated using the Cool Farm Tool, and WF and LU adapted from the Water Footprint Network and Food and Agriculture Organization, respectively. Shifting to healthy guidelines nationally required a minor increase in dietary energy (3%), with larger increases in fruit (18%) and vegetable (72%) intake, though baseline proportion of dietary energy from fat and protein was adequate and did not change significantly. Meeting healthy guidelines slightly increased environmental footprints by about 3-5% across GHG emissions, blue and green WFs, and LU. However, these national averages masked substantial variation within sub-populations. For example, shifting to healthy diets among those with dietary energy intake below recommended guidelines would result in increases of 28% in GHG emissions, 18 and 34% in blue and green WFs, respectively, and 41% in LU. Decreased environmental impacts were seen among those who currently consume above recommended dietary energy (-6 to -16% across footprints). Adoption of affluent diets by the whole population would result in increases of 19-36% across the environmental indicators. Specific food groups contributing to these shifts varied by scenario. Environmental impacts also varied markedly between six major Indian sub-regions. In India, where undernutrition is prevalent, widespread adoption of healthy diets may lead to small increases in the environmental footprints of the food system relative to the status quo, although much larger increases would occur if there was widespread adoption of diets currently consumed by the wealthiest quartile of the population. To achieve lower diet-related disease burdens and reduced environmental footprints of the food system, greater efficiency of food production and reductions in food waste are likely to be required alongside promotion of healthy diets.

Indexed as

DietEnvironmentModels, TheoreticalAir PollutantsHumansIndiaAir PollutantsDietary guidelinesDietary intakeGreenhouse gas emissionsIndiaLand useSustainable dietsWater use

Identifiers

PMID30802638
PMCPMC6437131
OpenAlexW2916012624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.