Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802463›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2019

Revisiting the Landmark Task as a tool for studying hemispheric specialization: What's really right?

Anna Seydell-Greenwald, Serena F Pu, Katrina Ferrara, Catherine E Chambers, Elissa L Newport, Barbara Landau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of Lateralization of Language on Cognition Among Left-Handers.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna Seydell-GreenwaldCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Building D, Suite 145, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA. Electronic address: as2266@georgetown.edu.
Serena F PuCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Building D, Suite 145, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.
Katrina FerraraCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Building D, Suite 145, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA; Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20010, USA.
Catherine E ChambersCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Building D, Suite 145, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.
Elissa L NewportCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Building D, Suite 145, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.
Barbara LandauCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Building D, Suite 145, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA; Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Krieger Hall, 2400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001432 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI UMANS, JASON G · 2015 to 2024
$7.5M
Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GIOIA, GERARD A. · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Language and cognition after perinatal strokeR01DC016902 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GAILLARD, WILLIAM DAVIS, NEWPORT, ELISSA L · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Postdoctoral Training in Developmental Disabilities ResearchT32HD046388 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2006 to 2016
$1.5M
Language development and linguistic processing after left hemisphere perinatal strokeK18DC014558 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI NEWPORT, ELISSA L · 2015 to 2016
$349k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17GRNT33650054NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001432NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD046388NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257NIDCD NIH HHS K18 DC014558NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Landmark Task" (LT) is a line bisection judgment task that predominantly activates right parietal cortex. The typical version requires observers to judge bisections for horizontal lines that cross their egocentric midline and therefore may depend on spatial attention as well as spatial representation of the line segments. To ask whether the LT is indeed right-lateralized regardless of spatial attention (for which the right hemisphere is known to be important), we examined LT activation in 26 neurologically healthy young adults using vertical (instead of horizontal) stimuli, as compared with a luminance control task that made similar demands on spatial attention. We also varied task difficulty, which is known to affect lateralization in both spatial and language tasks. Despite these changes to the task, we observed right-lateralized parietal activations similar to those reported in other LT studies, both at group level and in individual lateralization indices. We conclude that LT activation is robustly right-lateralized, perhaps uniquely so among commonly-studied spatial tasks. We speculate that the unique properties of the LT reside in its requirement to judge relative magnitudes of the two line segments, rather than in the more general aspects of spatial attention or visual-spatial representation.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAdultBrain MappingDominance, CerebralFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionfMRILateralizationLine bisectionParietal lobeVisual-spatial functions

Identifiers

PMID30802463
PMCPMC6440843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.