ArticleNeuropsychologia2019
Revisiting the Landmark Task as a tool for studying hemispheric specialization: What's really right?
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemispheric efficiency during the day: the influence of circadian preference and time-of-day on verbal and visuospatial tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Effects of Lateralization of Language on Cognition Among Left-Handers.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Atypical lateralization of visuospatial attention can be associated with better or worse performance on line bisection.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Developmental changes in neural lateralization for visual-spatial function: Evidence from a line-bisection task.Developmental science · 2022Article
- The Allocation of Vertical Attention in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Receiving Dialysis.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Development of bilateral parietal activation for complex visual-spatial function: Evidence from a visual-spatial construction task.Developmental science · 2021Article
- Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation.NeuroImage · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "Landmark Task" (LT) is a line bisection judgment task that predominantly activates right parietal cortex. The typical version requires observers to judge bisections for horizontal lines that cross their egocentric midline and therefore may depend on spatial attention as well as spatial representation of the line segments. To ask whether the LT is indeed right-lateralized regardless of spatial attention (for which the right hemisphere is known to be important), we examined LT activation in 26 neurologically healthy young adults using vertical (instead of horizontal) stimuli, as compared with a luminance control task that made similar demands on spatial attention. We also varied task difficulty, which is known to affect lateralization in both spatial and language tasks. Despite these changes to the task, we observed right-lateralized parietal activations similar to those reported in other LT studies, both at group level and in individual lateralization indices. We conclude that LT activation is robustly right-lateralized, perhaps uniquely so among commonly-studied spatial tasks. We speculate that the unique properties of the LT reside in its requirement to judge relative magnitudes of the two line segments, rather than in the more general aspects of spatial attention or visual-spatial representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.