Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802367›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Searching for the neurite density with diffusion MRI: Challenges for biophysical modeling.

Björn Lampinen, Filip Szczepankiewicz, Mikael Novén, Danielle van Westen, Oskar Hansson, Elisabet Englund, Johan Mårtensson, Carl-Fredrik Westin, Markus Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Joint estimation of compartment-specific TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Björn LampinenClinical Sciences Lund, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-4443
Filip SzczepankiewiczClinical Sciences Lund, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mikael NovénCentre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Danielle van WestenClinical Sciences Lund, Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Oskar HanssonClinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elisabet EnglundClinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan MårtenssonClinical Sciences Lund, Department of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Carl-Fredrik WestinBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, US.
Markus NilssonClinical Sciences Lund, Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PUJOL, SONIA · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
Novel DT-MRI Analyses of White Matter in SchizophreniaR01MH074794 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2007 to 2021
$9.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902NIH HHS P41EB015898NIH HHS P41EB015902NIH HHS R01MH074794NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074794Random Walk Imaging MN15Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning AM13-0090Vetenskapsrådet 2016-03443Vetenskapsrådet 349-2007-869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo mapping of the neurite density with diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a high but challenging aim. First, it is unknown whether all neurites exhibit completely anisotropic ("stick-like") diffusion. Second, the "density" of tissue components may be confounded by non-diffusion properties such as T2 relaxation. Third, the domain of validity for the estimated parameters to serve as indices of neurite density is incompletely explored. We investigated these challenges by acquiring data with "b-tensor encoding" and multiple echo times in brain regions with low orientation coherence and in white matter lesions. Results showed that microscopic anisotropy from b-tensor data is associated with myelinated axons but not with dendrites. Furthermore, b-tensor data together with data acquired for multiple echo times showed that unbiased density estimates in white matter lesions require data-driven estimates of compartment-specific T2 values. Finally, the "stick" fractions of different biophysical models could generally not serve as neurite density indices across the healthy brain and white matter lesions, where outcomes of comparisons depended on the choice of constraints. In particular, constraining compartment-specific T2 values was ambiguous in the healthy brain and had a large impact on estimated values. In summary, estimating neurite density generally requires accounting for different diffusion and/or T2 properties between axons and dendrites. Constrained "index" parameters could be valid within limited domains that should be delineated by future studies.

Indexed as

DendritesModels, TheoreticalMyelin SheathNeuritesAdultBiophysicsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleWhite Matteranisotropyaxonsdendritesdiffusion MRImyelinneurites

Identifiers

PMID30802367
PMCPMC6503974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.