Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802318›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Exploring the Use of Smartphone Geofencing to Study Characteristics of Alcohol Drinking Locations in High-Risk Gay and Bisexual Men.

Tyler B Wray, Ashley E Pérez, Mark A Celio, Daniel J Carr, Alexander C Adia, Peter M Monti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Space and Place in Alcohol Research.Current epidemiology reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler B WrayDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-9141
Ashley E PérezDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences , University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Mark A CelioDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Daniel J CarrDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Alexander C AdiaDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Peter M MontiDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Virology CoreP01AA019072 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI KAHLER, CHRISTOPHER W. · 2010 to 2024
$19.7M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA023336NIAAA NIH HHS P01 AA019072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeofencing offers new opportunities to study how specific environments affect alcohol use and related behavior. In this study, we examined the feasibility of using geofencing to examine social/environmental factors related to alcohol use and sexual perceptions in a sample of gay and bisexual men (GBM) who engage in heavy drinking and high-risk sex.

methodsHIV-negative GBM (N = 76) completed ecological momentary assessments for 30 days via a smartphone application and were prompted to complete surveys when inside general geofences set around popular bars and clubs. A subset (N = 45) were also asked to complete surveys when inside personal geofences, which participants set themselves by identifying locations where they typically drank heavily.

resultsApproximately 49% of participants received a survey prompted by a general geofence. Among those who identified at least 1 personal drinking location, 62.2% received a personal geofence-prompted survey. Of the 175 total location-based surveys, 40.2% occurred when participants were not at the location that was intended to be captured. Participants reported being most able to openly express themselves at gay bars/clubs and private residences, but these locations were also more "sexualized" than general bars/clubs. Participants did not drink more heavily at gay bars/clubs, but did when in locations with more intoxicated patrons or guests.

conclusionsGeofencing has the potential to improve the validity of studies exploring environmental influences on drinking. However, the high number of "false-positive" prompts we observed suggests that geofences should be used carefully until improvements in precision are more widely available.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingBisexualityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual PartnersSmartphoneSocial EnvironmentUnsafe SexYoung AdultAlcohol UseContextEcological Momentary AssessmentEcologyGay and Bisexual MenGeospatial DataLocation

Identifiers

PMID30802318
PMCPMC6502660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.