Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802305›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2019

Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer.

S E Vollenbrock, F E M Voncken, J M van Dieren, D M J Lambregts, M Maas, G J Meijer, L Goense, S Mook, K J Hartemink, P Snaebjornsson and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. New frontiers in esophageal radiology.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S E VollenbrockDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2721-663X
F E M VonckenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J M van DierenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M MaasDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
G J MeijerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L GoenseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5824-8736
S MookDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
K J HarteminkDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
L C Ter BeekDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
B M P AlemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
R G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A Bartels-RuttenDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer may benefit from non-surgical management. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of visual response assessment of the primary tumour after nCRT on T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI.

methodsPatients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer who underwent T2W- and DW-MRI (1·5 T) before and after nCRT in two hospitals, between July 2013 and September 2017, were included in this prospective study. Three radiologists evaluated T2W images retrospectively using a five-point score for the assessment of residual tumour in a blinded manner and immediately rescored after adding DW-MRI. Histopathology of the resection specimen was used as the reference standard; ypT0 represented a pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and interobserver agreement were calculated.

resultsTwelve of 51 patients (24 per cent) had a pCR. The sensitivity and specificity of T2W-MRI for detection of residual tumour ranged from 90 to 100 and 8 to 25 per cent respectively. Respective values for T2W + DW-MRI were 90-97 and 42-50 per cent. AUCs for the three readers were 0·65, 0·66 and 0·68 on T2W-MRI, and 0·71, 0·70 and 0·70 on T2W + DW-MRI (P = 0·441, P = 0·611 and P = 0·828 for readers 1, 2 and 3 respectively). The κ value for interobserver agreement improved from 0·24-0·55 on T2W-MRI to 0·55-0·71 with DW-MRI.

conclusionPreoperative assessment of residual tumour on MRI after nCRT for oesophageal cancer is feasible with high sensitivity, reflecting a low chance of missing residual tumour. However, the specificity was low; this results in overstaging of complete responders as having residual tumour and, consequently, overtreatment.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyAdenocarcinomaAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID30802305
PMCPMC6594024
OpenAlexW2915603089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.