Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30802180›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2019

Use of a Humanized Mouse Model System in the Validation of Human Radiation Biodosimetry Standards.

Monica Pujol-Canadell, Erik Young, Lubomir Smilenov

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica Pujol-CanadellColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Erik YoungColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Lubomir SmilenovColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
Somatostatin analogues as countermeasures against intestinal radiation toxicityU19AI067798 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAO, NELSON J. · 2005 to 2024
$82.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a planned or unplanned radiation exposure, determination of absorbed dose has great clinical importance, informing treatment and triage decisions in the exposed individuals. Biodosimetry approaches allow for determination of dose in the absence of physical measurement apparatus. The current state-of-the-art biodosimetry method is based on the frequency of induced dicentric chromosomes in peripheral blood T cells, which is proportional to the absorbed radiation dose. Since dose-response curves used for obtaining absorbed dose for humans are based on data sourced from

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome AberrationsDNA DamageFemaleHumansMiceRadiometryReference StandardsT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID30802180
PMCPMC6570637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.