ArticleJournal of global oncology2019
Early Detection for Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline.
Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second-generation capsule endoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps: An updated systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of prospective studies.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Pooled it
- The role of health economic evidence in clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer: a comparative analysis across countries.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Pooled it
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- A comprehensive systematic review of colorectal cancer screening clinical practices guidelines and consensus statements.British journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Predictors of treatment refusal in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review.Seminars in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment of Patients With Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline.JCO global oncology · 2020Guideline
- Comorbidity patterns and their associations with performance status and treatment receipt in breast and colorectal cancers in a multiethnic Asian setting: a latent class analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Investigation of Intestinal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Colorectal Cancer and Detection of Biomarkers.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Low Rates of Digital Rectal Exam in an Academic Health System Represent a Missed Opportunity.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- [Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring of colorectal cancer : Radiology as a key component].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Utility of comprehensive genomic profiling combined with machine learning for prognostic stratification in stage II/III colorectal cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Assessing disparities in cancer resources distribution in Mexico.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Early-Stage Colon Cancer Surveillance: Pattern and Timing of Recurrence and the Role of 5-Year Surveillance.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Identifying phenotypes of colorectal malignant tumors using the quasi-bound state in the continuum of a terahertz metasurface biosensor.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes and lymph node metastasis following endoscopic resection with additional surgery or primary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Colorectal Cancer Mortality.Cancers · 2024Article
- Molecular profiling of risk factors for relapse in Japanese patients with stage II colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- A cell-free DNA colorectal cancer screening test promising enhanced accessibility and early detection.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Review
- ASCO Global Guidelines: Methods and Opportunities.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo provide resource-stratified, evidence-based recommendations on the early detection of colorectal cancer in four tiers to clinicians, patients, and caregivers.
methodsAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, surgery, gastroenterology, health technology assessment, cancer epidemiology, pathology, radiology, radiation oncology, and patient advocacy experts. The Expert Panel reviewed existing guidelines and conducted a modified ADAPTE process and a formal consensus-based process with additional experts (Consensus Ratings Group) for two round(s) of formal ratings.
resultsExisting sets of guidelines from eight guideline developers were identified and reviewed; adapted recommendations form the evidence base. These guidelines, along with cost-effectiveness analyses, provided evidence to inform the formal consensus process, which resulted in agreement of 75% or more.
conclusionIn nonmaximal settings, for people who are asymptomatic, are ages 50 to 75 years, have no family history of colorectal cancer, are at average risk, and are in settings with high incidences of colorectal cancer, the following screening options are recommended: guaiac fecal occult blood test and fecal immunochemical testing (basic), flexible sigmoidoscopy (add option in limited), and colonoscopy (add option in enhanced). Optimal reflex testing strategy for persons with positive screens is as follows: endoscopy; if not available, barium enema (basic or limited). Management of polyps in enhanced is as follows: colonoscopy, polypectomy; if not suitable, then surgical resection. For workup and diagnosis of people with symptoms, physical exam with digital rectal examination, double contrast barium enema (only in basic and limited); colonoscopy; flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsy (if contraindication to latter) or computed tomography colonography if contraindications to two endoscopies (enhanced only).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.