Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30801747›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2019

Recurrent Noncoding Mutations in Skin Cancers: UV Damage Susceptibility or Repair Inhibition as Primary Driver?

Steven A Roberts, Alexander J Brown, John J Wyrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular mechanism of UV damage modulation in nucleosomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic sites hypersensitive to ultraviolet radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven A RobertsSchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164.
Alexander J BrownSchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164.
John J WyrickSchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164.

Funding

TRAINING IN BIOTECHNOLOGY: EMPHASIS ON PROTEIN CHEMISTRYT32GM008336 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALL, DOUGLAS R. · 1989 to 2023
$8.9M
Regulation of DNA Excision Repair in ChromatinR01ES028698 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI John J Wyrick · 2018 to 2026
$2.7M
Mechanisms of genome instability induced by APOBEC Cytidine Deaminases & its impacts during cancer development - Diversity SupplementR01CA218112 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, STEVEN A · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
TC-NER IN THE REPAIR AND MUTAGENESIS OF DNA ALKYLATION DAMAGER21ES029302 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, PENG, WYRICK, JOHN J · 2018 to 2019
$421k
Genome-wide analysis of UV damage formation, repair, and mutagenesisR21ES027937 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, STEVEN A, WYRICK, JOHN J · 2017 to 2018
$419k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218112NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028698NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES027937NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES029302NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic mutations arising in human skin cancers are heterogeneously distributed across the genome, meaning that certain genomic regions (e.g., heterochromatin or transcription factor binding sites) have much higher mutation densities than others. Regional variations in mutation rates are typically not a consequence of selection, as the vast majority of somatic mutations in skin cancers are passenger mutations that do not promote cell growth or transformation. Instead, variations in DNA repair activity, due to chromatin organization and transcription factor binding, have been proposed to be a primary driver of mutational heterogeneity in melanoma. However, as discussed in this review here, recent studies indicate that chromatin organization and transcription factor binding also significantly modulate the rate at which UV lesions form in DNA. The authors propose that local variations in lesion susceptibility may be an important driver of mutational hotspots in melanoma and other skin cancers, particularly at binding sites for ETS transcription factors.

Indexed as

Binding SitesDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansMelanomaMutagenesisMutationMutation RateNucleic Acid ConformationNucleosomesPromoter Regions, GeneticProto-Oncogene Proteins c-etsSkin NeoplasmsUltraviolet RaysNucleosomesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-etsDNA lesionsETS transcription factorsmelanomamutational heterogeneitymutation hotspotsnucleosomenucleotide excision repairpyrimidine dimer

Identifiers

PMID30801747
PMCPMC6571124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.