SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) for open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open-angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open-angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent for open-angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) for open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Subconjunctival draining minimally-invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Cyclodestructive procedures for non-refractory glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Six year outcomes of combined phacoemulsification surgery and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Safety of Individual Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Characteristics of the Ciliary Body in Healthy Chinese Subjects Evaluated by Radial and Transverse Imaging of Ultrasound Biometric Microscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Outcomes of chronic angle-closure glaucoma treated by phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with or without endoscopically goniosynechialysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- High-Resolution Ex-Vivo Imaging of Retina with a Laptop-Based Portable Endoscope.Journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Techniques for Open-Angle Glaucoma: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Combined Surgeries including Intraocular Direct Cyclophotocoagulation with a 532 nm Laser to Treat Advanced Neovascular Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on open angle glaucoma.Eye (London, England) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. A number of minimally invasive surgical techniques have been introduced as a treatment to prevent glaucoma progressing. Among them, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) is a cyclodestructive procedure developed by Martin Uram in 1992.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ECP in people with open angle glaucoma (OAG) and primary angle closure whose condition is inadequately controlled with drops. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2018, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. The date of the search was 12 July 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ECP compared to other surgical treatments (other minimally invasive glaucoma device techniques, trabeculectomy), laser treatment or medical treatment. We also planned to include trials where these devices were combined with phacoemulsification compared to phacoemulsification alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors planned to independently extract data from reports of included studies using a data collection form and analyse data based on methods expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome was proportion of participants who were drop-free (not using eye drops). Secondary outcomes included mean change in IOP; proportion of participants who achieved an IOP of 21 mmHg or less, 17 mmHg or less or 14 mmHg or less; and proportion of participants experiencing intra- and postoperative complications, We planned to measure all outcomes in the short-term (six to 18 months), medium-term (18 to 36 months), and long-term (36 months onwards). MAIN
resultsWe found one ongoing study that met our inclusion criteria (ChiCTR-TRC-14004233). The study compares combined phacoemulsification with ECP to phacoemulsification alone in people with primary angle closure glaucoma. The primary outcome is intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of IOP-lowering drugs. A total of 50 people have been enrolled. The study started in February 2014 and the trialists have completed recruitment and are in the process of collecting data. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is currently no high-quality evidence for the effects of ECP for OAG and primary angle closure. Properly designed RCTs are needed to assess the medium and long-term efficacy and safety of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.