Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30801052›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies2018

Just-in-Time but Not Too Much: Determining Treatment Timing in Mobile Health.

Peng Liao, Walter Dempsey, Hillol Sarker, Syed Monowar Hossain, Mustafa Al'absi, Predrag Klasnja, Susan Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Data-driven Interpretable Policy Construction for Personalized Mobile Health.IEEE International Conference on Digital Health. IEEE International Conference on Digital Health · 2022
    Article
  11. Advancing Behavioral Intervention and Theory Development for Mobile Health: The HeartSteps II Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Digital Health and Addiction.Current opinion in systems biology · 2020
    Article
  20. Personalized HeartSteps: A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Optimizing Physical Activity.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng Liao *University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Walter Dempsey *Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Hillol SarkerIBM TJ. Watson Research Center, Cambridge, MA.
Syed Monowar HossainUniversity of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
Mustafa Al'absiUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Predrag KlasnjaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Susan MurphyHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Funding

Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LI, RUNZE · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
TRAINING U54EB020404 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KUMAR, SANTOSH · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Heart Steps: Adaptive mHealth intervention for physical-activity maintenanceR01HL125440 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Predrag Klasnja · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
Data-Based Methods for Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions in Alcohol UseR01AA023187 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MURPHY, SUSAN A · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125440NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023187NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020404NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing scientific interest in the use and development of just-in-time adaptive interventions in mobile health. These mobile interventions typically involve treatments, such as reminders, activity suggestions and motivational messages, delivered via notifications on a smartphone or a wearable to help users make healthy decisions in the moment. To be effective in influencing health, the combination of the right treatment and right delivery time is likely critical. A variety of prediction/detection algorithms have been developed with the goal of pinpointing the best delivery times. The best delivery times might be times of greatest risk and/or times at which the user might be most receptive to the treatment notifications. In addition, to avoid over burdening users, there is often a constraint on the number of treatments that should be provided per time interval (e.g., day or week). Yet there may be many more times at which the user is predicted or detected to be at risk and/or receptive. The goal then is to spread treatment uniformly across all of these times. In this paper, we introduce a method that spreads the treatment uniformly across the delivery times. This method can also be used to provide data for learning whether the treatments are effective at the delivery times. This work is motivated by our work on two mobile health studies, a smoking cessation study and a physical activity study.

Indexed as

Budget ConstraintJust-in-Time Adaptive InterventionMobile HealthTreatment Timing

Identifiers

PMID30801052
PMCPMC6380673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.