ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2019
Introducing the Concepts of Advocacy and Social Determinants of Health Within the Pediatric Clerkship.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ACEs Educational Interventions for Medical Students and Residents: A Systematic Review.Family medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Unpacking educational approaches for social accountability in health professions education: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Health Curriculum for the Pediatric Clerkship.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
- Policy Advocacy Workshop Tools for Training Medical Students to Act on Climate Change.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023Article
- Preparing Doctors in Training for Health Activist Roles: A Cross-Institutional Community Organizing Workshop for Incoming Medical Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Using simulation to increase resident comfort discussing social determinants of health.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Developing and implementing core competencies in children's environmental health for students, trainees and healthcare providers: a narrative review.BMC medical education · 2021Review
- Down to the Last Dollar: Utilizing a Virtual Budgeting Exercise to Recognize Implicit Bias.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2021Article
- Leveraging Medical Students' Experiences with Social Determinants of Health During Their Pediatric Clerkship to Drive Curriculum.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Experiential Learning as a Path to Critical Consciousness in the Medical Curriculum: A Qualitative Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although advocacy and social determinants of health (SDH) are fundamental components of pediatrics and other areas of health care, medical education often lacks formal training about these topics and the role of health care professionals as advocates. SDH are common targets of advocacy initiatives; however, little is known about optimal ways to incorporate this content into medical education curricula. Methods: We developed a lecture and assessment for third-year medical students that included interactive discussion of advocacy, SDH issues specific to children, and opportunities for learners to engage in advocacy. Learners attended the lecture during the pediatric clerkship. Over the course of a year, questionnaires assessing knowledge of advocacy, SDH, and incorporation of advocacy into practice were administered to 75 students before the lecture and as the clerkship ended. We used chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to compare knowledge before and after the lecture. Results: Students showed significant improvement on most individual questions and overall passing rates. Learners provided positive feedback on the quality of the lecture material and demonstrated interest in engaging in current advocacy projects to address SDH. Discussion: As recognition of the importance of advocacy and SDH increases, the development of educational tools for teaching this information is critical. Our lecture produced significant improvement in knowledge of these topics and was well received by students. Early introduction to advocacy and SDH during relevant clinical rotations emphasizes the importance of these topics and may establish a foundation of advocacy as fundamental to health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.