Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800998›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2019

Introducing the Concepts of Advocacy and Social Determinants of Health Within the Pediatric Clerkship.

Melanie C Marsh, Sarah Supples, Skyler McLaurin-Jiang, Callie L Brown, Julie M Linton

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Social Determinants of Health Curriculum for the Pediatric Clerkship.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  4. Policy Advocacy Workshop Tools for Training Medical Students to Act on Climate Change.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Down to the Last Dollar: Utilizing a Virtual Budgeting Exercise to Recognize Implicit Bias.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melanie C MarshPediatric Resident, Wake Forest School of Medicine of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.
Sarah SupplesPediatric Resident, Wake Forest School of Medicine of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.
Skyler McLaurin-JiangInstructor, Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.
Callie L BrownAssistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-5652
Julie M LintonAssistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although advocacy and social determinants of health (SDH) are fundamental components of pediatrics and other areas of health care, medical education often lacks formal training about these topics and the role of health care professionals as advocates. SDH are common targets of advocacy initiatives; however, little is known about optimal ways to incorporate this content into medical education curricula. Methods: We developed a lecture and assessment for third-year medical students that included interactive discussion of advocacy, SDH issues specific to children, and opportunities for learners to engage in advocacy. Learners attended the lecture during the pediatric clerkship. Over the course of a year, questionnaires assessing knowledge of advocacy, SDH, and incorporation of advocacy into practice were administered to 75 students before the lecture and as the clerkship ended. We used chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to compare knowledge before and after the lecture. Results: Students showed significant improvement on most individual questions and overall passing rates. Learners provided positive feedback on the quality of the lecture material and demonstrated interest in engaging in current advocacy projects to address SDH. Discussion: As recognition of the importance of advocacy and SDH increases, the development of educational tools for teaching this information is critical. Our lecture produced significant improvement in knowledge of these topics and was well received by students. Early introduction to advocacy and SDH during relevant clinical rotations emphasizes the importance of these topics and may establish a foundation of advocacy as fundamental to health care.

Indexed as

ChildClinical ClerkshipCurriculumEducation, MedicalHealth PersonnelHumansKnowledgePediatricsPhysician's RoleSocial Determinants of HealthStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvocacyDiversitySocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID30800998
PMCPMC6376941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.