Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800975›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2018

Introductory Surgical Skills Course: Technical Training and Preparation for the Surgical Environment.

Sarah Miller, Edward Shipper, Brittany Hasty, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Edmund W Lee, Dana Lin, James N Lau

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Asynchronous Technical Feedback: A Workshop for Training Surgical Instructors.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond the Exam Room: Teaching Intervisit Care to Internal Medicine Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah MillerMedical Student, Stanford University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-1813
Edward ShipperSurgical Education Fellow, Goodman Surgical Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Brittany HastySurgical Education Fellow, Goodman Surgical Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Sylvia Bereknyei MerrellDirector of Research, Goodman Surgical Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Edmund W LeeSurgical Education Fellow, Goodman Surgical Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Dana LinClinical Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine.
James N LauClinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Stanford University · USGoodman (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Early exposure to surgery in a positive learning environment can contribute to increased student interest. The primary objectives of this study included developing increased comfort in the operating room (OR) environment, confidence in surgical skills, and mentorship for students interested in surgery. Methods: The course comprised seven 2-hour sessions covering both nontechnical and technical skills facilitated by attending and resident surgeons. Sessions included nontechnical skills training, basic knot tying and suturing, laparoscopic surgical skills, and high-fidelity operative simulations on animal and cadaver models. The curriculum also matched students with faculty mentors in order to scrub into operative cases. Surveys assessing self-reported comfort in the OR, confidence levels in surgical skills, and whether students had mentors in surgery were distributed before and after the course. Results: Thirty preclinical medical students were enrolled in the course in 2016 and an additional 41 students in 2017. Results showed increased confidence in all skills and in comfort in the OR, as well as increased surgeon mentorship. Thirty-two students who completed the course entered clinical rotations in 2018 and, when surveyed, reported increased confidence in the aforementioned domains and in their preparedness for their surgery clerkship, compared to 49 peers who had not completed the course. Discussion: The course successfully increased comfort in the OR, increased confidence in performing surgical skills, and provided students with mentors in surgery, all of which will hopefully foster positive experiences during their surgery clerkship and ultimately increase their consideration of surgery as a career.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateGeneral SurgeryHumansStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingEarly Exposure to SurgeryStudent ConfidenceSurgeon MentorsSurgical Environment

Identifiers

PMID30800975
PMCPMC6342345
OpenAlexW2902990736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.