Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800764›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2017

Medical Genetics Ethics Case Collection: Discussion Materials for Medical Students in the Genomic Era.

Shoumita Dasgupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students: a systematic literature review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complexities of Clinical Genetics Consultation: An Interprofessional Clinical Skills Workshop.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shoumita DasguptaAssociate Professor, Department of Medicine, Biomedical Genetics Section, and the Department of Medical Sciences and Education, Boston University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis collection of cases in medical genetics focuses on ethical dimensions of genetic testing. Given the recent and continuing revolution in genetic testing technologies, understanding the nuances of genetic tests and the implications of their outcomes for patients is a critical learning goal for medical students.

methodsThis case collection was developed for first-year medical students. The cases fall into two types: discussion cases that lend themselves to both small-group and lecture settings and brief audience-response clicker cases to be used in larger lecture settings. The cases span topics such as direct-to-consumer genetic testing, patient privacy, economic and legal issues of genetic testing, and secondary findings in whole exome/genome sequencing. The clicker cases can be used to punctuate class sessions on the related science, while the discussion cases can be deployed as a single 2-hour session focusing on ethics. The associated materials include teaching notes on the scientific and ethical dimensions of the cases, a slide presentation of the cases, and implementation advice.

resultsStudents found that engaging with these cases was very stimulating and eye-opening. Student comments indicated that they appreciated the opportunity to grapple with the ethical dimensions of the genetic testing technologies and that the challenges brought to light highlighted the complexity of medical practice in the genomic era. DISCUSSION: Although these cases were originally developed for use with medical students, they could easily be adapted for use in postgraduate and CME settings to explore complex ethical scenarios on which even the experts disagree.

Indexed as

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingGenomic MedicineGINAIncidental FindingsMitochondrial ManipulationMitochondrial Replacement TherapyPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineRegenerative MedicineSecondary FindingsStem CellsWhole Exome SequencingWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30800764
PMCPMC6342050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.