ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2017
Understanding Patient Experience: A Course for Residents.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of Patient Feedback in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Annual Patient EXposure of residents in training over 20 years (APEX-trial): a retrospective analysis from a public teaching hospital.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Real Patient Participation in Workplace-Based Assessment of Health Professional Trainees: A Scoping Review.Evaluation & the health professions · 2024Article
- An Interactive, Case-Based Workshop on the Patient Experience for Internal Medicine Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
- Satisfaction Academy: A Novel Residency Curriculum to Improve the Patient Experience in the Emergency Department.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018Article
- Understanding Partnerships With Patients/Clients in a Team Context Through Verbatim Theater.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA 4-hour curriculum was developed to provide residents with information about the concepts of patient satisfaction and experience. The course focuses on the competencies of professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills. It is designed to allow participants to reflect on current knowledge of the patient experience and service principles and to develop a greater appreciation of these concepts' utility and importance to everyday work.
methodsThirty-two residents in 2015 and nine incoming residents in 2016 participated in weekly hour-long sessions over 4 weeks. The curriculum also included an optional fifth component, in which patient satisfaction data were provided to the residents. Residents participated in pre- and postcurriculum survey assessments regarding their awareness of concepts involving patient experience.
resultsPreliminary results suggested that residents found the curriculum beneficial and that it helped to increase their understanding of the relevance of patient satisfaction and experience education to their practice. Quarterly feedback from patient surveys was provided to residents, identifying strengths and opportunities for improvement. DISCUSSION: Given the growing importance and utilization of patient satisfaction surveys, residents participated in this educational intervention to determine if a novel curriculum and proactive approach to resident understanding and utilization of satisfaction data could result in increased patient satisfaction with resident interactions. The study is ongoing and longitudinal, with initial results encouraging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.