Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800747›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2017

A Joint Quality Improvement and High-Value Care Curriculum in a Limited-Resource Setting.

Anne Cioletti, Suzanne Sweidan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne CiolettiAssistant Professor, Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Suzanne SweidanClinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince the release of the Institute of Medicine's

methodsWe adapted material from two online resources-(1) Institute of Healthcare Improvement Open School and (2) American College of Physicians High Value Cost-Conscious Care Curriculum-to create a combined curriculum for use in a limited-resource setting. Our curriculum is divided into 10 seminars, each including both QI techniques and HVC theories, which are reinforced using a series of patient scenarios. Residents apply their knowledge in self-directed projects presented in the final seminar. Evaluation includes a pre-/postexposure QI knowledge application test, survey of self-assessed knowledge, and anonymous course feedback.

resultsFor the 46 residents who completed the series, a statistically significant improvement in both tests was measured, and feedback was positive overall. Tailoring our in-seminar patient scenarios allowed residents to demonstrate their HVC knowledge acquisition. DISCUSSION: This seminar-based curriculum can be adapted to the time availability in any residency program and transfer to other disciplines with modification of the patient scenarios.

Indexed as

Curriculum DevelopmentHigh-Value CareQuality ImprovementResident Training

Identifiers

PMID30800747
PMCPMC6342157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.