Article3 Biotech2019
Cyanobacterial phylogenetic analysis based on phylogenomics approaches render evolutionary diversification and adaptation: an overview of representative orders.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- New cyanobacterial genus Argonema is hidding in soil crusts around the world.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Phylogenomic Analyses of Members of the Widespread Marine Heterotrophic GenusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phylogenetic studies based on a definite set of marker genes usually reconstruct evolutionary relationships among the prokaryotic species. Based on specific target sequences, such studies represent variations and allow identification of similarities or dissimilarities in organisms. With the advent of completely sequenced genomes and accumulation of information on whole prokaryotic genomes, phylogenetic reconstructions should be considered more reliable if they are ideally based on entire genomes to resolve phylogenetic interest. We applied phylogenomics approaches taking into account completely sequenced cyanobacterial genomes to reconstruct underlying species that represented major taxonomic classes and belonged to distinctly different habitats (freshwater, marine, soils, and rocks). We did not rely on describing phylogeny of all representative class of cyanobacterial species on the basis of only ribosomal gene, 16S rDNA gene. In contrast, we analyzed combined molecular marker and phylogenomics approaches (genome alignment, gene content and gene order, composition vector and protein domain content) for accurately inferring phylogenetic relationship of species. We have shown that this approach reflects the impact of evolution on the organisms and considers connects with the ecological adaptation in cyanobacteria in different habitats. Analysis revealed that the members from marine habitat occupy different profile than those from freshwater. Impact of GC content and genomic repetitiveness over the diversification of cyanobacterial species and their possible role in adaptation was also reflected. Members occupying similar habitats cover more evolutionary distance together and also evolve various strategies for adaptation and survival either through genomic repetitiveness or preferences for genes of particular functions or modified GC content. Genomes undergo different changes for their adaptation in diverse habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.