Article3 Biotech2019
Enhanced degradation of indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene using
Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatio-temporal distribution and biotechnological potential of culturable yeasts in the intertidal sediments and seawater of Aoshan Bay, China.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Nanomaterial-mediated strategies for enhancing bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A systematic review.Hybrid advances · 2024Article
- Cocoyam powder extracted fromHeliyon · 2023Article
- Biosurfactant from Candida: sources, classification, and emerging applications.Archives of microbiology · 2023Review
- Enzymatic Treatments for Biosolids: An Outlook and Recent Trends.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Harnessing fungal bio-electricity: a promising path to a cleaner environment.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- A review of the role of biosurfactants in the biodegradation of hydrophobic organopollutants: production, mode of action, biosynthesis and applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
- Fungal biosurfactants, from nature to biotechnological product: bioprospection, production and potential applications.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021Review
- Isolation and characterization of a newly naphthalene-degrading3 Biotech · 2020Article
- Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Toxicity, and Remediation Approaches.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seven yeast isolates were screened for the remediation of indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (InP) using biosynthesized iron nanoparticles and produced biosurfactant in growth medium. Four yeast isolates showed positive response to produce biosurfactant which was confirmed by drop collapse test, emulsification index, methylene blue agar plate method, oil displacement test and lipase activity. The yeast strain showing maximum potential for InP degradation and biosurfactant production was identified as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.