ArticleBiomedical optics express2019
Comparison of time- and angular-domain scatter rejection in mesoscopic optical projection tomography: a simulation study.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved intraoperative identification of close margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma resections using a dual aperture fluorescence ratio approach: first in-human results.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Challenges and advances in optical 3D mesoscale imaging.Journal of microscopy · 2022Article
- Model-based system matrix for iterative reconstruction in sub-diffuse angular-domain fluorescence optical projection tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Angular restriction fluorescence optical projection tomography to localize micrometastases in lymph nodes.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical imaging offers exquisite sensitivity and resolution for assessing biological tissue in microscopy applications; however, for samples that are greater than a few hundred microns in thickness (such as whole tissue biopsies), spatial resolution is substantially limited by the effects of light scattering. To improve resolution, time- and angular-domain methods have been developed to reject detection of highly scattered light. This work utilizes a modified version of a commonly used Monte Carlo light propagation software package (MCML) to present the first comparison of time- and angular-domain improvements in spatial resolution with respect to varying sample thickness and optical properties (absorption and scattering). Specific comparisons were made at various tissue thicknesses (1-6 mm) assuming either typical (average) soft tissue scattering properties,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.