ArticleRoyal Society open science2019
Goat
Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential Candidate Genes Associated with Litter Size in Goats: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Comprehensive whole-genome resequencing unveils genetic diversity and selective signatures of the Xiangdong black goat.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Population validation of reproductive gene mutation loci and association with the litter size in Nubian goat.Archives animal breeding · 2021Article
- Detection of a 4 bp Mutation in the 3'UTR Region of GoatAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Comprehensive analysis of mRNAs and miRNAs in the ovarian follicles of uniparous and multiple goats at estrus phase.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Genomic Signatures of Selection Associated With Litter Size Trait in Jining Gray Goat.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genome-wide selection signatures analysis of litter size in Dazu black goats using single-nucleotide polymorphism.3 Biotech · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.