Tandem repeat disorders.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Get ready for short tandem repeats analysis using long reads-the challenges and the state of the art.Frontiers in genetics · 2025
   Review
2. Genome engineering on size reduction and complexity simplification: A review.Journal of advanced research · 2024
   Review
3. nPoRe: n-polymer realigner for improved pileup-based variant calling.BMC bioinformatics · 2023
   Article
4. Tandem repeats in giant archaeal Borg elements undergo rapid evolution and create new intrinsically disordered regions in proteins.PLoS biology · 2023
   Article
5. The role of structural variations in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
   Review
6. Straglr: discovering and genotyping tandem repeat expansions using whole genome long-read sequences.Genome biology · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.