Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800269›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2019

Design and analysis of longitudinal trials of antimicrobial use at the end of life: to give or not to give?

Manisha Juthani-Mehta, Heather G Allore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manisha Juthani-MehtaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Heather G AlloreYale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, Suite 775, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-8175

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Individualized Absolute Risk calculator For Persons With Multiple Chronic ConditionsR01AG047891 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLORE, HEATHER GWYNN · 2015 to 2017
$990k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective review considers analytic features of the design of a longitudinal trial regarding antimicrobial therapy in older terminal cancer patients receiving palliative care. We first overview antimicrobial use at the end of life; both the potential hazards and benefits. Antimicrobial prescribing should consider both initiation as well as cessation of medications when analyzing the burden of medications. Approaches to decision making regarding antimicrobial use are presented and the importance of health literacy in these decision processes. We next present aspects of both feasibility and comparative trial design with a health literacy intervention to reduce antimicrobial use in older terminal cancer patients receiving palliative care. Considerations to clustered randomization and given that infections can reoccur over a trial period, we share suggestions of longitudinal modeling of clustered randomized trial data.

Indexed as

antimicrobial therapyend-of-life carehealth literacylongitudinal analysistrial design

Identifiers

PMID30800269
PMCPMC6378640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.