Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800190›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2018

Simone Perandini, Alessio Perandini, Gino Puntel, Giovanni Puppini, Stefania Montemezzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Research progress on minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone PerandiniAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), Verona, Italy.
Alessio PerandiniAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), Verona, Italy.
Gino PuntelAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), Verona, Italy.
Giovanni PuppiniAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), Verona, Italy.
Stefania MontemezziAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI), Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the present study is to systematically assess the prevalence and characteristics of the MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 150 consecutive patients (112 males, average age 73 years) referred to CTA for lower limb arterial evaluation were included in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, anastomosis incidence, artery diameter, distance from the symphysis pubis, Kellgren-Lawrence score, and pelvic size were evaluated.

resultsIn this study 40.6% of patients presented at least one competent CM arterial anastomosis. In the 300 evaluated arteries, 90 arterial anastomoses were found (30%), 40 on the right side (average diameter 1.63 mm) and 50 on the left side (1.78 mm). In 32 cases there was only one anastomosis, while in 29 cases the CM was bilateral. No anastomoses were detected in 89 patients. Mean distance from the symphysis was 50 mm. No relevant association with hip osteoarthrosis was found for CM. Mean pelvic size was 213 mm.

conclusionsThe evidence from this study suggests that CM is a common variant that needs to be acknowledged before pelvic intervention.

Indexed as

computerised tomography angiographycorona mortisvariant anatomy

Identifiers

PMID30800190
PMCPMC6384405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.