Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800106›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Comparison of Small Gut and Whole Gut Microbiota of First-Degree Relatives With Adult Celiac Disease Patients and Controls.

Rahul Bodkhe, Sudarshan A Shetty, Dhiraj P Dhotre, Anil K Verma, Khushbo Bhatia, Asha Mishra, Gurvinder Kaur, Pranav Pande, Dhinoth K Bangarusamy, Beena P Santosh and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Variations in gut microbiota in celiac disease patients: a systematic review.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Human Microbiome-A Physiologic Perspective.Comprehensive Physiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul BodkheNational Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Sudarshan A ShettyNational Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Dhiraj P DhotreNational Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Anil K VermaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Khushbo BhatiaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Asha MishraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gurvinder KaurDepartment of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pranav PandeNational Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Dhinoth K BangarusamyAgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Kerala, India.
Beena P SantoshAgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Kerala, India.
Rajadurai C PerumalAgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Kerala, India.
Vineet AhujaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Yogesh S ShoucheNational Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Govind K MakhariaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INNational Centre for Cell Science · INSciGenom Labs (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies on celiac disease (CeD) have reported alterations in the gut microbiome. Whether this alteration in the microbial community is the cause or effect of the disease is not well understood, especially in adult onset of disease. The first-degree relatives (FDRs) of CeD patients may provide an opportunity to study gut microbiome in pre-disease state as FDRs are genetically susceptible to CeD. By using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we observed that ecosystem level diversity measures were not significantly different between the disease condition (CeD), pre-disease (FDR) and control subjects. However, differences were observed at the level of amplicon sequence variant (ASV), suggesting alterations in specific ASVs between pre-disease and diseased condition. Duodenal biopsies showed higher differences in ASVs compared to fecal samples indicating larger disruption of the microbiota at the disease site. The duodenal microbiota of FDR was characterized by significant abundance of ASVs belonging to

Indexed as

butyrateceliacduodenal microbiotaglutengut microbiotaH. pylori

Identifiers

PMID30800106
PMCPMC6376745
OpenAlexW2773155053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.