Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800098›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2019

Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Very and Extremely Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Eduardo Villamor-Martinez, Mohammed A Kilani, Pieter L Degraeuwe, Ronald I Clyman, Eduardo Villamor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo Villamor-MartinezDepartment of Pediatrics, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Mohammed A KilaniDepartment of Pediatrics, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Pieter L DegraeuweDepartment of Pediatrics, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Ronald I ClymanCardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Eduardo VillamorDepartment of Pediatrics, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally accepted that intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) increases morbidity and mortality among very preterm neonates. However, evidence is hampered by the widespread practice of using the terms small for gestational age (SGA) and IUGR as synonyms. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting on the association between IUGR/SGA and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. Of 993 studies reviewed, 47 (50,790 infants) were included. Studies were combined using a random effects model and sources of heterogeneity were determined by subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Meta-analysis of all included studies showed a significantly reduced risk of PDA in the SGA/IUGR group with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.82, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.70 to 0.96 (

Indexed as

growth restrictionmeta-analysismeta-regressionpatent ductus arteriosussmall for gestational agevery preterm infant

Identifiers

PMID30800098
PMCPMC6376617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.