Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30800076›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2019

More Than Just a Bandage: Closing the Gap Between Injury and Appendage Regeneration.

Anneke D Kakebeen, Andrea E Wills

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Shh signaling directs dorsal ventral patterning in the regeneratingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The amazing and anomalous axolotls as scientific models.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Tissue disaggregation and isolation of specific cell types from transgenic Xenopus appendages for transcriptional analysis by FACS.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. From Cell Death to Regeneration: Rebuilding After Injury.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anneke D KakebeenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Andrea E WillsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of vertebrate regenerationR01NS099124 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Andrea Elizabeth Wills · 2017 to 2026
$3.3M
Defining the mechanism of chromatin accessibility modifications in vertebrate appendage regenerationR03HD091716 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILLS, ANDREA ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2018
$149k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD091716NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable regenerative capabilities of amphibians have captured the attention of biologists for centuries. The frogs

Indexed as

epigeneticinnate immunelimb budproliferationreactive oxygen speciesregenerationtailXenopus

Identifiers

PMID30800076
PMCPMC6376490
OpenAlexW2912988478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.