Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30799990›Full record

ArticleCentral-European journal of immunology2018

Expression of E-cadherin, β-catenin, and epithelial membrane antigen does not predict survival in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Sławomir Poletajew, Łukasz Fus, Tomasz Ilczuk, Piotr Wojcieszak, Małgorzata Sękowska, Wojciech Krajewski, Aleksander Wasiutyński, Barbara Górnicka, Piotr Radziszewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central-European journal of immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cadherin Signaling in Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sławomir PoletajewDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz FusDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz IlczukDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr WojcieszakDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata SękowskaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Aleksander WasiutyńskiDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara GórnickaDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

the aim of the studyThe aim of the study was to validate the value of E-cadherin and MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-nine consecutive patients with primary stage T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) were enrolled in this study. Tissue specimens were stained with the following mouse anti-human antibodies: anti-E-cadherin, anti-

resultsThe mean follow-up was 34.8 months. Recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were 47.5%, 72.5%, and 72.5%, respectively. Differences in the IRS for

conclusionsExpression of E-cadherin,

Indexed as

bladder cancerdisease progressionimmunohistochemistryrecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID30799990
PMCPMC6384421
OpenAlexW2910362027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.