Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30799892›Full record

ReviewSudanese journal of paediatrics2018

Feeding growth restricted premature neonates: a challenging perspective.

Siba P Paul, Emily N Kirkham, Katherine A Hawton, Paul A Mannix

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sudanese journal of paediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Demographic and clinical predictors and inter-center variability of tube feeding in preterm NICU patients.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Dilemmas in establishing preterm enteral feeding: where do we start and how fast do we go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siba P PaulTorbay Hospital, Torquay, UK.
Emily N KirkhamSouthmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Katherine A HawtonRoyal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Paul A MannixSouthmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBRoyal United Hospital · GBTorbay Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition in the postnatal period is essential to achieve optimal growth and maintain biochemical normality. Feeding growth-restricted premature neonates remains a big challenge for pediatricians and neonatologists. The choice of milk is one of the biggest challenges. Breast milk is recommended, although feeding with preterm formulas can ensure a more consistent delivery of optimal levels of nutrients. The timing of introduction of feeds and the rate of advancement of those feeds in preterm infants are both topics of significant controversy. Early feeding is advantageous because it improves the functional adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract and reduces the duration of total parenteral nutrition. A faster rate of advancement will also reduce the duration of need for parenteral nutrition. Despite this, enteral feeding is often delayed and is often slowly increased in high-risk infants because of a possible increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Growth-restricted neonates are at increased risk of developing NEC due to a combination of antenatal and postnatal disturbances in gut perfusion. If enteral feeding is introduced earlier and advanced more quickly, this may lead to increased risk of NEC, but slower feeds extend the duration of parenteral nutrition and its risks and may have adverse consequences for survival, growth, and development. Premature infants pose a significant nutritional challenge. Overall, we would suggest the preferential use of human breast milk, early minimal enteral feeds, and standardized feeding protocols with cautious advancements of feeds to facilitate gastrointestinal adaptation and reduce the risk of NEC, however further research is needed.

Indexed as

Breast milkGrowth restrictionNecrotizing enterocolitisNutritionPremature neonatesSmall for gestational ageTotal parenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID30799892
PMCPMC6378572
OpenAlexW2907081553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.