ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2018
Bayesian Approximate Kernel Regression with Variable Selection.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of sirolimus in pediatric vascular anomalies: a BKMR-PopPK exposure-response framework for individualized risk and dosing.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Joint regression analysis of multiple traits based on genetic relationships.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Asymptotics of Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation in Random Features Regression.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023Article
- Leveraging the genetic correlation between traits improves the detection of epistasis in genome-wide association studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- A topological data analytic approach for discovering biophysical signatures in protein dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Bayesian multitrait kernel methods improve multienvironment genome-based prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Multi-scale inference of genetic trait architecture using biologically annotated neural networks.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Label propagation defines signaling networks associated with recurrently mutated cancer genes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- VARIABLE PRIORITIZATION IN NONLINEAR BLACK BOX METHODS: A GENETIC ASSOCIATION CASE STUDYThe annals of applied statistics · 2019Article
- Systematic mapping of BCL-2 gene dependencies in cancer reveals molecular determinants of BH3 mimetic sensitivity.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Melanoma Therapeutic Strategies that Select against Resistance by Exploiting MYC-Driven Evolutionary Convergence.Cell reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonlinear kernel regression models are often used in statistics and machine learning because they are more accurate than linear models. Variable selection for kernel regression models is a challenge partly because, unlike the linear regression setting, there is no clear concept of an effect size for regression coefficients. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that provides an effect size analog for each explanatory variable in Bayesian kernel regression models when the kernel is shift-invariant - for example, the Gaussian kernel. We use function analytic properties of shift-invariant reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) to define a linear vector space that: (i) captures nonlinear structure, and (ii) can be projected onto the original explanatory variables. This projection onto the original explanatory variables serves as an analog of effect sizes. The specific function analytic property we use is that shift-invariant kernel functions can be approximated via random Fourier bases. Based on the random Fourier expansion, we propose a computationally efficient class of Bayesian approximate kernel regression (BAKR) models for both nonlinear regression and binary classification for which one can compute an analog of effect sizes. We illustrate the utility of BAKR by examining two important problems in statistical genetics: genomic selection (i.e. phenotypic prediction) and association mapping (i.e. inference of significant variants or loci). State-of-the-art methods for genomic selection and association mapping are based on kernel regression and linear models, respectively. BAKR is the first method that is competitive in both settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.