Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30799880›Full record

ReviewJournal of physics D: Applied physics2018

The 2018 correlative microscopy techniques roadmap.

Toshio Ando, Satya Prathyusha Bhamidimarri, Niklas Brending, H Colin-York, Lucy Collinson, Niels De Jonge, P J de Pablo, Elke Debroye, Christian Eggeling, Christian Franck and 26 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of physics D: Applied physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mitochondria in disease: changes in shapes and dynamics.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Toshio AndoNano Life Science Institute (WPI-NanoLSI), Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8819-154X
Satya Prathyusha BhamidimarriDepartment of Life Sciences & Chemistry, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Niklas BrendingIonovation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany.
H Colin-YorkMRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Headley Way, OX3 9DS Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6585-3237
Lucy CollinsonFrancis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Niels De JongeINM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
P J de PabloDpto. Física de la Materia Condensada Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-3186
Elke DebroyeKU Leuven, Department of Chemistry, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Christian EggelingMRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Headley Way, OX3 9DS Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3698-5599
Christian FranckDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706, United States of America.
Marco FritzscheMRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Headley Way, OX3 9DS Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hans GerritsenDebye Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ben N G GiepmansDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Kay GrunewaldDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Johan HofkensKU Leuven, Department of Chemistry, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Jacob P HoogenboomImaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4539-8772
Kris P F JanssenKU Leuven, Department of Chemistry, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-9635
Rainer KaufmanDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Judith KlumpermannSection Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4835-6228
Nyoman KurniawanCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jana KuschUniversity Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Nalan LivSection Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-9117
Viha ParekhCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Diana B PeckysFaculty of Medicine, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Florian RehfeldtUniversity of Göttingen, Third Institute of Physics-Biophysics, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-3835
David C ReutensCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Maarten B J RoeffaersKU Leuven, Department of Bioscience Engineering, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Tim SaldittUniversity of Göttingen, Institute for X-Ray Physics, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Iwan A T SchaapSmarAct GmbH, Schütte-Lanz-Str. 9, D-26135 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6665-5104
Ulrich S SchwarzInstitute for Theoretical Physics and BioQuant, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Paul VerkadeSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Michael W VogelCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Richard WagnerDepartment of Life Sciences & Chemistry, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Mathias WinterhalterDepartment of Life Sciences & Chemistry, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Haifeng YuanKU Leuven, Department of Chemistry, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Giovanni ZifarelliDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
KU Leuven · BEThe University of Queensland · AUConstructor University · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBUtrecht University · NLCentre for Human Genetics · GBUniversity of Göttingen · DEEcogenomics (Japan) · JPHeidelberg University · DEJena University Hospital · DEKanazawa University · JPLeibniz-Institute for New Materials · DELeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology · DESaarland University · DESmarAct (Germany) · DEThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC001999Medical Research Council G0902418Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/9Medical Research Council MC_UU_12010/9Medical Research Council MR/K01577X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in microscopy have been instrumental to progress in the life sciences, and many new techniques have been introduced and led to new discoveries throughout the last century. A wide and diverse range of methodologies is now available, including electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, small-angle x-ray scattering and multiple super-resolution fluorescence techniques, and each of these methods provides valuable read-outs to meet the demands set by the samples under study. Yet, the investigation of cell development requires a multi-parametric approach to address both the structure and spatio-temporal organization of organelles, and also the transduction of chemical signals and forces involved in cell-cell interactions. Although the microscopy technologies for observing each of these characteristics are well developed, none of them can offer read-out of all characteristics simultaneously, which limits the information content of a measurement. For example, while electron microscopy is able to disclose the structural layout of cells and the macromolecular arrangement of proteins, it cannot directly follow dynamics in living cells. The latter can be achieved with fluorescence microscopy which, however, requires labelling and lacks spatial resolution. A remedy is to combine and correlate different readouts from the same specimen, which opens new avenues to understand structure-function relations in biomedical research. At the same time, such correlative approaches pose new challenges concerning sample preparation, instrument stability, region of interest retrieval, and data analysis. Because the field of correlative microscopy is relatively young, the capabilities of the various approaches have yet to be fully explored, and uncertainties remain when considering the best choice of strategy and workflow for the correlative experiment. With this in mind, the Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics presents a special roadmap on the correlative microscopy techniques, giving a comprehensive overview from various leading scientists in this field, via a collection of multiple short viewpoints.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopycorrelative microscopyelectron microscopyfluorescence microscopymagnetic resonance imagingsuper-resolution microscopyx-ray microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30799880
PMCPMC6372154
OpenAlexW2889280798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.