ArticleKorean journal of radiology2019
A Newly-Developed Flow Diverter (FloWise) for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm: Results of a Pilot Clinical Study.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- FloWise Flow Diverter for Treatment of Unruptured Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Pivotal Study.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Trial
- Flow Diverter Performance Comparison of Different Wire Materials for Effective Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Advances in endovascular aneurysm management: flow modulation techniques with braided mesh devices.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2020Review
- A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in theKorean journal of radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe report the results of a pilot clinical study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of a newly-developed, retrievable flow diverter (FloWise; Taewoong Medical) for the treatment of internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 10 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were 1) unruptured aneurysm with a dome size of ≥ 8 mm and a neck size of ≥ 4 mm at the ICA, or 2) two or more unruptured aneurysms of any size able to be spanned by a single FloWise at the ICA. Co-primary effectiveness end points were technical success of FloWise placement, and a 50% or greater decrease in aneurysm volume at the 6-month follow-up angiogram. The primary safety end point was the new development of neurological deficits persisting for more than 1-month post-treatment.
resultsTen patients harboring 14 ICA aneurysms (median diameter, 9.4 mm; range, 2.3-31.0 mm) were enrolled between January 2016 and July 2017. FloWise placement was successful in all patients. There were no newly-developed neurological deficits during the 6-month clinical follow-up period. One patient did not receive follow-up imaging due to pregnancy. Nine patients with 12 aneurysms received a 6-month angiographic follow-up. Ten aneurysms (83.3%) showed decreases in volume greater than 50% (mean volume decrease, 82.8 ± 32.9%), of which 8 (66.7%, 95% confidence interval, 35.4-98.0%) showed complete occlusion. One patient was retreated due to mass symptom aggravation.
conclusionsIn this pilot study, FloWise appeared to be safe and effective for ICA aneurysm treatment. A prospective multicenter study to validate the effectiveness and safety of FloWise would be worthwhile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.