Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30799518›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2019

The Haeckel reception in Sweden.

Lennart Olsson, Uwe Hossfeld

Abstract readBiographyHistorical ArticlePortrait
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lennart OlssonInstitut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Erbertstr. 1, 07743, Jena, Germany. Lennart.Olsson@uni-jena.de.
Uwe HossfeldBiology Education Research Group, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Bienenhaus, Am Steiger 3, 07743, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Haeckel reception in different European countries has received some attention from historians of biology, but the reception in Scandinavia remains relatively unknown. We have found letters to and from Haeckel to Swedish scientists and students in the Ernst Haeckel House in Jena and in the archives of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (RSAS) in Stockholm. Here we present correspondence with Wilhelm Leche, Sven Lovén, and M. G. Retzius, all prominent scientists in Stockholm at the time and members of the RSAS. Most letters cover scientific matters such as the biogenetic law, or are concerned with practical matters such as loans of specimens. Sometimes also political issues are mentioned. In addition, we present a letter from Anton Nyström, the radical physician, in which he tells of his struggles with the church and the conservatives, and a letter from the explorer and geographer Sven Hedin, written in the midst of the First World War. Examples are also given of letters to Haeckel from students that were inspired by his world view as laid out in "Natural History of Creation". In conclusion, Haeckel's correspondence with his colleagues in Stockholm gives insights not only into how Haeckel's ideas were received at the time, but also into the relationships between the Swedish scientists, including their conflicting political views.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionDevelopmental BiologyGermanyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyPhylogenySwedenAnton NyströmMagnus Gustaf RetziusMonismSven HedinSven LovénWilhelm Leche

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.