Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30799432›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2019

Effect of Multidrug-Resistant 1 (MDR1) and CYP3A4*1B Polymorphisms on Cyclosporine-Based Immunosuppressive Therapy in Renal Transplant Patients.

Maciej J Kotowski, Anna Bogacz, Joanna Bartkowiak-Wieczorek, Karol Tejchman, Krzysztof Dziewanowski, Marek Ostrowski, Bogusław Czerny, Edmund Grześkowiak, Bogusław Machaliński, Jerzy Sieńko

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cannabis Pharmacogenomics: A Path to Personalized Medicine.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maciej J KotowskiDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Anna BogaczDepartment of Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants, Poznań, Poland.
Joanna Bartkowiak-WieczorekLaboratory of Experimental Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmacy, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Karol TejchmanDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Krzysztof DziewanowskiNephrology-Transplant Centre, Department of the Regional Public Hospital in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Marek OstrowskiDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Bogusław CzernyDepartment of Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants, Poznań, Poland.
Edmund GrześkowiakLaboratory of Experimental Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmacy, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Bogusław MachalińskiDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Jerzy SieńkoDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLInstitute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine A (CsA) are characterized by a narrow therapeutic range and high interindividual pharmacokinetic variations. Therefore, the effective monitoring of drug serum level is crucial for successful therapy. This variability can be caused by polymorphisms in genes encoding drug transporters and enzymes responsible for biotransformation. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between CYP3A4*1B and MDR1 polymorphisms and dose requirements to achieve the target therapeutic range for CsA. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study group consisted of 184 patients after kidney transplantation who were treated with immunosuppressive therapy. The MDR1 3435C>T and CYP3A4*1B polymorphisms were determined by the real-time PCR using the LightCycler® 480 device (Roche Diagnostics). RESULTS Patients with the CYP3A4*1/*1 genotype received the lowest mean dose of CsA compared to CYP3A4*1/*1B, and had a higher average drug concentration in the blood. In the case of MDR1 3435C>T polymorphism, we observed that patients with the CC genotype received lower doses of CsA than patients with the CT and TT genotypes. Average drug concentration in the blood was comparable to individuals with different MDR-1 genotypes. Analysis of dependence between both polymorphisms and concentration/dose ratio showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS The characterization of CYP3A4*1B and 3435C>T MDR1 polymorphism cannot provide useful guidance for individualizing CsA dosages in renal transplant patients by indicating the optimal dose of these drugs without exposing patients to possible adverse effects associated mainly with nephrotoxicity.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAllelesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1CyclosporineCytochrome P-450 CYP3AFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1CyclosporineCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3AImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30799432
PMCPMC6400024
OpenAlexW2915482784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.