Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30799199›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

The prognostic landscape of interactive biological processes presents treatment responses in cancer.

Bin He, Rui Gao, Dekang Lv, Yalu Wen, Luyao Song, Xi Wang, Suxia Lin, Qitao Huang, Ziqian Deng, Zifeng Wang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bin HeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Rui GaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Institute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, PR China; Department of Medical Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 510275, PR China.
Dekang LvInstitute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, PR China.
Yalu WenDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Luyao SongInstitute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, PR China.
Xi WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Suxia LinState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Qitao HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Ziqian DengInstitute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, PR China.
Zifeng WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Min YanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Feimeng ZhengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
Eric W-F LamDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN, UK.
Keith W KelleyLaboratory of Immunophysiology, Department of Animal Sciences, College of ACES and Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.
Zhiguang LiInstitute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, PR China. Electronic address: zhiguangli2013@126.com.
Quentin LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Institute of Cancer Stem Cell, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, PR China. Electronic address: liuq9@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2012MAYPR070Breast Cancer Now 2012NOVPHD016Cancer Research UK 12011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential gene expression patterns are commonly used as biomarkers to predict treatment responses among heterogeneous tumors. However, the link between response biomarkers and treatment-targeting biological processes remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a prognosis-guided approach to establish the determinants of treatment response.

methodsThe prognoses of biological processes were evaluated by integrating the transcriptomes and clinical outcomes of ~26,000 cases across 39 malignancies. Gene-prognosis scores of 39 malignancies (GEO datasets) were used for examining the prognoses, and TCGA datasets were selected for validation. The Oncomine and GEO datasets were used to establish and validate transcriptional signatures for treatment responses.

findingsThe prognostic landscape of biological processes was established across 39 malignancies. Notably, the prognoses of biological processes varied among cancer types, and transcriptional features underlying these prognostic patterns distinguished response to treatment targeting specific biological process. Applying this metric, we found that low tumor proliferation rates predicted favorable prognosis, whereas elevated cellular stress response signatures signified resistance to anti-proliferation treatment. Moreover, while high immune activities were associated with favorable prognosis, enhanced lipid metabolism signatures distinguished immunotherapy resistant patients.

interpretationThese findings between prognosis and treatment response provide further insights into patient stratification for precision treatments, providing opportunities for further experimental and clinical validations. FUND: National Natural Science Foundation, Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China, National Key Research and Development Program, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, MRC, CRUK, Breast Cancer Now, Imperial ECMC, NIHR Imperial BRC and NIH.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorDatasets as TopicDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBiological processesCell-proliferationImmune processesPrognosisTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID30799199
PMCPMC6441875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.