Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30798500›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Exploring inter-species sensitivity to a model hydrocarbon, 2-Methylnaphtalene, using a process-based model.

Adriana E Sardi, Starrlight Augustine, Gro H Olsen, Lionel Camus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Model to Assess Thermal Stress.Environmental science & technology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana E SardiAkvaplan-niva, High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, 9296, Tromsø, Norway. adrianasardi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-2006
Starrlight AugustineAkvaplan-niva, High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Gro H OlsenAkvaplan-niva, High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Lionel CamusAkvaplan-niva, High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Akvaplan-niva · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway Latin Amerika Project number 227180/H30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared inter-species sensitivity to a model narcotic compound, 2-Methylnaphthalene, to test if taxonomical relatedness, feeding guilds, and trophic level govern species sensitivities on species distributed in different regions. We fitted a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic model to survival patterns over time for 26 species using new and raw data from the literature. Species sensitivity distributions provided little insight into understanding patterns in inter-species sensitivity. The range of no-effect concentrations (NEC) obtained for 26 species showed little variation (mean 0.0081 mM; SD 0.009). Results suggest that the NEC alone does not explain the complexity of the species tolerances. The dominant rate constant and the derived time to observe an effect (t

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAquatic OrganismsArctic RegionsEcotoxicologyLethal Dose 50NaphthalenesNarcoticsNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityToxicity TestsToxicokineticsTropical ClimateWater Pollutants, Chemical2-methylnaphthaleneNaphthalenesNarcoticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalGUTSNarcoticsNo effect concentrationSSDSurvivalToxicodynamicsToxicokinetics

Identifiers

PMID30798500
OpenAlexW2916918402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.